My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/04/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/04/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:03:09 PM
Creation date
5/5/2003 3:04:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/04/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Compliance with the City Staff review letter dated January 31, 2002, Revised March 28, <br />2002, with modifications to point 4 to include language regarding a variance in lieu of a <br />private street <br />The applicant receiving a variance to the front yard setback <br />A revised street design will be provided <br />Variance is approved for the length of the road. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, Brauer, <br />Reeve, Sweet, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Sunflower Ridge; Case of Oakwood Land <br />Development <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained Oakwood Land Development has applied <br />for sketch plan review of a townhome development proposed to be named Sunflower Ridge. The <br />property is generally located north of Alpine Drive and west of T.H. #47. The property is <br />currently zoned B-1 and B-2 Business. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject <br />property for development with low density residential uses. City Council recently approved a <br />2002 Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that changes the preferred land use from low <br />density residential to medium density residential. If the Metropolitan Council approves the <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, a rezoning of the property from B-1 Business to R-3 <br />Urban Residential will be required to develop the property with residential uses at a net density <br />not to exceed 7 units per acre. The property is approximately 18.8 acres in size. She explained <br />the sketch plan is proposing 131 units, which equates to a gross density of 7 units per acre. The <br />maximum number of units allowed will be calculated on a net density of land area exclusive of <br />wetlands and major roads. There appear to be wetlands present on the property; the number of <br />units will have to be reduced in order to comply with the net density maximum. The total <br />density attainable may also be impacted by the site plan review. Interpretation of lot size <br />requirements in the current R-3 Urban Residential standards require a total lot area of 690,000 <br />square feet for the 131 units proposed; the parcel is 871,200 square feet in area. In accordance <br />with the new private street policy, the sketch plan is proposing a main public street through the <br />project area that also connects with proposed streets in Evergreen Point to the east and the replat <br />of Wildlife Sanctuary to the north. There are private driveway collectors completing the road <br />system through the plat. Staff is suggesting that the plan be revised to provide for a future road <br />connection to the west, reorient buildings to reduce the number of driveways on public streets, <br />look for ways to eliminate cut-through traffic wherever possible. Sidewalks will be required <br />along one side of the public streets. A detailed drainage and grading plan will be addressed <br />during the preliminary plat and site plan process. The project is also subject to the review and <br />permitting process of the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (WMO) and <br />MPCA. She said Staff is requesting that there be an area of common open space that can be used <br />for active or passive recreation within the neighborhood. As a guideline for minimum green <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 4, 2002 <br /> Page 9 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.