Laserfiche WebLink
them as homeowners. She stated they would not be doing anything to degrade this and they <br />would actually fix it up and maintain the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Avengroth stated with the popularity of condos in Ramsey, he wondered if this may be <br />rezoned as condos and sold as separate properties. <br /> <br />Ms. Borsey stated they could not advertise this as condos because there are two units and the land <br />could not be split and sold separately and they could not be combined and sold as one. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Johnson noted if they cOuld sell thed~: ~i).~ theY could rent out both · <br /> <br />Mr Trud~eon stated they could ~?~: :~ <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik stated it would have to be rezone& %:~(~::~::?: <br /> . <br />Acting Chairperson Johnson stated that if they ke~¢:':~(~i~Ccupied, he thought it would <br />be difficult to sell this because the owner would need t~ live ~ '¢~t: <br /> <br />Mr. Avengroth stated he feared for the ,mmuni¢;~}? <br /> <br />~ner Jeffrey. Voting No: <br />Nixt and Commissioner <br /> <br />Motion Failed. Voting Yes: Acting <br />Commissioners Shepherd, Brauer, <br />Van Scoy. <br /> <br />The Commission went through fi;ridihgs <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated n~}~i~ 17 "may impact the use of surrounding residents" and 18, <br />"wil! ~ot", the last sentence in l:8~s~U[~:~be "may". <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson stated his probl~¢~¢this is that the C~ goes with the prope~. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated' n~ber 20, "will be disturbing", 21 is not relevant and should be <br />stricken. Nmnber 22 is also not relevant. <br /> -. ::.~ -.: <br />Mr. Trudgeon stated .number 22:.ig':pa: of their standard language. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer noted' number 23, "Will not" <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik wondered if they should add a concern about potential impact of absentee homeowner <br />in a residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer thought this could be added as item 21. "Lack of the owner occupancy <br />requirement may be detrimental to the character Of the existing neighborhood?' And Number 24, <br />"will not". <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 7, 2004 <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />