Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for <br />Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 (PSD Business Park A) as required pursuant to M.S., Section <br />469.175, Subd. 3 are as follows: <br />1. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 (PSD Business Park A) is an economic <br />development district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 12. <br />Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 (PSD Business Park A) is a contiguous geographic area <br />within the City's Development District No. 1, delineated in the TIF Plan, for the purpose of <br />financing economic development in the City through the use of tax increment. The District is in <br />the public interest because it will facilitate the construction of an approximately 60,000 square <br />foot industrial facility in the City which will increase employment in the state as well as preserve <br />and enhance the tax base of the state. <br />2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably <br />be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future <br />and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without <br />the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated <br />to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax <br />increments for the maximum duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 (PSD Business <br />Park A) permitted by the TIF Plan. <br />The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur <br />solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is <br />supported by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is an industrial facility that meets <br />the City's objectives for economic development. The cost of land acquisition, site and public <br />improvements and utilities in conjunction with achievable lease rates in the market, makes <br />development of the facility infeasible without City assistance. The added costs for a proposed <br />internal roadway will lead to a more efficient layout of buildings and maximize the amount of <br />value created on the site. The developer was asked for and provided a letter and a pro forma as <br />justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. <br />The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use <br />of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result <br />from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax <br />increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: The City <br />supported this finding on the grounds that the cost of land acquisition, site and public <br />improvements and utilities, and construction of a high quality building add to the total <br />development cost. The proposed project includes the construction of internal infrastructure on the <br />site to maximize future development potential, further adding to the total cost. The City <br />reasonably determines that no other development of similar scope is anticipated on this site <br />without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. <br />Therefore, the City concludes as follows: <br />a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will <br />increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. <br />