Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Nosan, seconded by Commissioner Surma, to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Nosan, Surma, Anderson, <br />Brauer, and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 8:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Surma, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Resolution #17-02-040 granting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for portions of <br />the Armstrong West area. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, Surma, Brauer, <br />Nosan, and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />5.03: Stone Brooke Academy Site Selection. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer stated it would be appropriate to postpone discussion on this item until the <br />applicant can be in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting. The Commission was in <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill recommended the Commission hear the presentation <br />from staff regarding the recent developments surrounding the Stone Brooke Academy site <br />selection. The Commission was in agreement to hear the update from staff. <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated Stone Brooke <br />apologized for not being able to attend this evenings meeting. He presented the staff report <br />stating the City Council has indicated more information is needed before a final decision can be <br />made regarding the Stone Brooke Academy site selection. The Council was concerned about the <br />ramifications this single project (about 1 acre) would have on the development of the larger <br />parcel/block (about 5 acres). The Council desires to know more about how the various <br />development challenges associated with this site will play out in various development scenarios <br />(i.e. Stone Brook proposal vs. single developer master planned site). <br /> <br />Development Challenges <br /> <br />(1) Yolite Street connection. Existing curb cuts. Existing intersection. Existing Storm water <br />line. <br />(2) Remnant lots. 1/2 acre lot. 3 acre lot. <br />(3) The well, and well easement. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 2, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />