My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 03/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 03/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:10:09 PM
Creation date
6/7/2017 12:46:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/02/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Johnson reported this was the case. He explained that he has been doing research over the <br />past two years which led him to deciding to choose Ramsey for his academy. He indicated he <br />recently received his director certification. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer asked what the difference was between a daycare and an academy. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated a daycare was an in-home service run by the County, while a childcare center <br />was run by human services and the State of Minnesota. He reported all building requirements <br />would be governed by the State. He elected to add the word academy after Stone Brook to set <br />his facility apart and to show it was focused on preschool education. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill encouraged the Commission to not get wrapped up <br />on this issue and noted this was a State licensing issue. He explained Stone Brook was proposing <br />to have a commercial childcare facility. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented on the building design. He asked if any brick could be put <br />on the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson indicated his plans architectural plans were preliminary and had yet to be finalized. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson questioned if the developer had looked over the four site plan options. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated he had reviewed these options. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson understood the Commission supported Plan B and asked if the developer <br />had any comments on this plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson had no concerns but recommended the east/west drive be further south for safety <br />purposes. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer questioned how drop-off and pick-up would be managed by Stone Brook. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson reported a receptionist would be hired to assist with this process and noted the <br />center would be open from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nosan inquired how many parking stalls the academy would have. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson indicated Stone Brook would have 27 parking stalls and he anticipated he would <br />have 18 staff members. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned if the building would have access from Sunwood. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated the building would only have one main entrance point, via the parking lot for <br />safety purposes. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission/March 2, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.