My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/04/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/04/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:34:29 AM
Creation date
11/1/2004 8:51:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/04/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Property may be condemned tbr use by a private interest, including a retail <br />store, parking, and an of Sce complex. The court will apply the same degree <br />of scrutiny over this type of condemnation that it applies to taking propert7 <br />roi' a purely public use. The court will look roi' some evidence in the record <br />that the taking serves a public purpose. <br /> <br />Even though a public eneiry, using its eminent domain powers, turns over <br />parcels to a private entiW for use by that private entity: the condemnation <br />will. nevertheless, be constitutional ifa public purpose is furthered by such a <br />transfer of' land. If it appears that the record contains some evidence that the <br />taking serves a public pm-pose, however informal, there is nothing lek for the <br />courts to pass upon. Absolute necessity is not required for a finding of <br />"public purpose" for a condemnation; rather, it is enough to find that the <br />proposed takine~ is reasonabl,,., necessary or convenient for the furtherance of <br />a proper purpose. <br /> <br />An appeal ora public pdrpose challenge to a taking does not become moot <br />merely by virtue of title in the property transferring to the party exercising the <br />taking. A public purpose challenge to a taking is not moot even where d~ere <br />have been subsequent changes to the property taken, where effective reiief~- <br />either through return ora portion or all of the property taken or some other <br />appropriate remedy--remains possible. <br /> <br />A city. may. chano,~=~ the use for which acquired land had been acquired after <br />title has been transferred in a condemnation proceeding. This does not <br />amount to a discontinuance of the condemnation. <br /> <br />Once title is acquired, even under threat of condemnation, the original fee <br />owner does not retain any reversionary interests even if the public purpose <br />for the property was abandoned. <br /> <br />The eminent domain procedure is initiated by' a petition, ,which must describe <br />the land to be taken and idendtS' the landowners. The petition is presented to <br />the district court of the county wi~ere the land is situated, asking that the <br />commissioners appraise the damages that may be caused if the land is r. aken. <br />At.least 20 days prior to tim presentation of the petition, a notice of the <br />petition and the time and place of its presentation must be served upon the <br />landowners named in the petition. If'certain landowners cannot be found, the <br />petitioner may flit an affidavit to that effect and fulfill the notice requirement <br />by publishing the required information in the official newspaper for three <br />consecutive weeks. Landowners ~vho are not served are not bound. <br /> <br />.~, right-of-way-map or plat must be served uoon a landowner along with the <br />,vritten demand. The petitioner has lO days following receipt of d~.e wri~en <br />demandzo furnish doe map. <br /> <br />':-{/q',iDi3OOK ,:':)l", ~VIIt'iNESO'[ x {.77llE~. <br /> <br />]'his chapter !asr revised o/2c)/29[~4 <br /> <br />113 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.