Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Jeffi-ey to recolnmend that City Council approve the <br />request for an Interim Use Permit to place a temporary modular structure that will be utilized for <br />banking reta[ed operation until December 31, 2005 wit the following conditions: <br /> 1. That the applicant will work with Mw'Dot to secure any necessary pemaits for drainage. <br /> 2. That the applicant will work with Staff on the appropriate aesthetic improvements i~' <br /> regard to landscaping, to include the possibility of using potted plants until the permanent <br /> structure is erected. <br /> <br />Motion came& Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Colnlnissioners Jeffi'ey, Brauer, Shepherd, Van <br />Scoy and Watson. Voting No' None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> <br />Case #2: Request for a Site Plan Review; Case of Automated EDM <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald advised Automated EDM cun-ently operates their office, warehouse, and <br />light manufactunng facility on the property located at 6231 McKinley Street. She stated their <br />existing facility is 12,576 square feet in size, and they are proposing to construct an 11,975 <br />square foot warehouse/light manufactmSng addition. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated the existing facility is located in the E-1 Employment District and <br />is considered a pen~nitted use in this district. She indicated the subject property is approximately <br />1.81 acres in size. She commented the lot coverage for the proposed project is approximately <br />3t%, and the addition meets the required fi'ont, rear, side yard setbacks, and parking stall <br />requirelnents. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald advised Staff has received a revised grading plan, but it ;~s still not quite <br />fight. She indicated Staff will continue to work with the Applicant and it will be revised before it <br />goes to the City Council. She stated Staff is comfortable with the development, however there <br />are some ~ading and drainage plan issues that still need review. She noted the Staff Review <br />Letter stated that these issues need to be addressed, and Staff will continue to work with the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />Russ Rosa. Rosa Architects, representing the applicant, indicated they were aware there may be <br />remaining issues on the grading and drainage plans and will work with Staff to get them <br />resolved. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if he has reviewed the Staff Review Letter, and if he has any issues with <br />their comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Rosa stated he has revieWed the letter and they are working on the requested revised plans. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if there were drainage and utility easements on the property now. <br /> <br />P4 <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 16, 2004 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />