Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 16 <br /> <br />,Voifan ;' <br />Comm '.. 483 b <br />Ct. 3i4! (1987) <br /> <br />~ qc ~ W L 73050. C,%~7 <br /> <br />~Mmn. C'. App Fao 24. 1908) <br /> <br />DeCoo,~' ~' C:a' qt' Roci~e.wer. <br /> <br />~Mmn. Ct. App Feb :4, iq~,."JZ <br /> <br />Ct 2886 ( i 992', <br /> <br />M'eiaahl. 607 N.W.Zd io8 <br />(hazardous buiimng) <br /> <br />Requiring a property owner EO ~ran~ a public easement across the beachffont <br />cfa lot. before the owner could receive a building permit, was a taking cfa <br />property interest for which the owner was constimtionaily entitled to just <br />compensation. <br /> <br />D Rezoning and failure to rezone <br /> <br />R. ezoning of property does nor constitute a taking since a land use regulation <br />constitutes a compensable raking only if it deprives tl~e landowner of all <br />reasonabie use ofd~e properpy. If an economically viable use of the land <br />remains afl:er ...*he rezoning, there is no taking. <br /> <br />A rezoning of'land from residential to industrial, if in conformity with the <br />comprehensive plan and a substantial value remains in'the use of the land as <br />industrial space, is not ~.taking that must be compensated. <br /> <br />E. Nuisances <br /> <br />A narrow exception has been carved out with respect to regulations <br />prohibiting something ¢',at would have been prohibited by' the state's properU' <br />or nuisance laws. <br /> <br />~Itllntc~ht'e.;'..¢7! N ~A".2d A7 <br />{Nlinn ~7'; ~pp IC~q7} <br /> <br />Oaie /¢ro.oerne.v. LLC2 v ,b'zale. <br />638 N W Id 7¢33 {MUm 2001) <br /> <br />F. Access <br /> <br />Property owners have a right of reasonably convenient and suitable access to <br />d~eir.'oroperu'. Deprivinc,. = a .... t)ropert,~ owner of reasonably convenient and <br />suitable access fi'om a street or highway' may' be an inverse condemnation. <br /> <br />A property owner who retained direct access to traffic in one direction, but <br />lost it in the other direction due to closure cfa median crossover, retained <br />reasonable access as a matter of law; thus. the closure of median crossover. <br />which allegedly reduced value of property, was a noncompensable exercise <br />ofsm~e's police power. <br /> <br />io-24 <br /> <br />- &Nt3 ?,OOK FOR 5,,lib NISS(.b'F4 CITIES <br /> <br />96 <br /> <br /> <br />