Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Shryock, Johns, Kuzma, <br />LeTourneau, Riley, and Williams. Voting No: None. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />None. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />7.01: Consider Adopting of Resolution #17-06-129 Approving Preliminary Plat for COR <br />Stonebrook Academy (Project #17-101): Case of Michael and Kristen Johnson <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation to <br />adopt Resolution #17-06-129 approving the Preliminary Plat request as recommended by the <br />Planning Commission. He stated that the proposed project appears to comply with the bulk <br />standards of The COR Design Framework and the proposed use would be an asset to The COR <br />development as well as the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that there were a few members of the Planning Commission that did <br />not vote in favor and asked for additional details. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that there are different aspects which include <br />the minimum zoning requirements and the fact that the City owns the parcel and has more <br />control. He stated that some of the comments were regarding whether this is the right location <br />for this business and whether more than the base minimum should be required. He stated that <br />there seems to be more concern with pitched roofs in the central corridor of The COR. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the City does have the flexibility and this does meet the <br />requirements, therefore this could be built. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that with the comments being addressed from <br />the staff review letter and Planning Commission conditions the request would meet the <br />standards. <br /> <br />Councilmember LeTourneau noted that he attended the Planning Commission meeting and there <br />was robust discussion. He stated that while not everyone agreed, the item did pass. He stated <br />that the comments he heard were around the location of the main door and whether that should <br />be on the Sunwood side. He stated that the decision showed flexibility in the City’s standards <br />that would best fit that use and would not set precedent. He agreed that it would not be <br />appropriate for the main door to be off Sunwood Drive. He referenced the glass and believed <br />that the building should have more glass. He wanted to ensure that the building meets the <br />minimum standard of glass for The COR. He believed that the proposal in front of the Council is <br />very reasonable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Williams stated that she does not see a reference to the cross-access easement. <br /> <br />City Council / June 13, 2017 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />