My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/27/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 06/27/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:33:55 PM
Creation date
7/11/2017 8:03:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/27/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1054
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the street. He stated that he would prefer to see a wider street with parking allowed on both <br />sides. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that a narrower roadway would have less impervious street. He <br />stated that public works supports a wider street. He asked how that would help public works and <br />public safety. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer stated that it is not just cars that park on the road but <br />people also put their trash cans down at the road. He stated that there will be a lot of no parking <br />signs in the neighborhood that would need to be enforced and parking would be at a premium. <br />He stated that he also has concern with the turning radius for public works vehicles, trash <br />vehicles, fire trucks, and school busses. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that there is concern for multiple large equipment vehicles responding <br />to an emergency. He stated that parking can be an issue, especially with enforcement. He noted <br />that for enforcement, one side would need to be adequately signed for no parking to be properly <br />enforced and not everyone wants a sign in their yard. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he appreciates the additional feedback from public <br />works and public safety but noted that the 29-foot width is something that public works and <br />public safety are willing to work with to ensure everyone is safe and the surface is reasonably <br />being used. He stated that he would therefore support the 29-foot width. He asked the width of <br />the Sunfish Lake subdivision. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the width varies from 28 to 29-foot width. <br />He stated that parking is not restricted in that development which has caused issues. He noted <br />that if the 29-foot width is approved there should be restricted parking. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked for input from the developer. <br />Steve Bona, Capstone Homes, stated that they sent a letter to staff on April 6th to provide <br />background information. He noted that their position comes from the experience they have in <br />other communities. He stated that the roadways in the other communities have 28 foot roadways <br />and there have not been problems. He noted that this is a common practice throughout the <br />growing cities in the metropolitan area. He stated that this will slow traffic down in a <br />neighborhood and that is why they do the narrower width. He stated that big roads make traffic <br />go faster. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he is still concerned with the density and the restricted <br />parking as that could be problematic for homeowners and therefore would support the wider <br />streets. <br />Mr. Bona stated that he visited Sunfish Lake and measured the roadway, which was 28 feet, and <br />that development does not have restricted parking. <br />City Council / June 13, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.