My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:34:07 PM
Creation date
11/5/2004 2:20:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/09/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The consensus of the Council was to direct staff to proceed with the Assistant Public Works <br />Director's suggestion. <br />Cul-de-sac <br />Mr. Schmidt expressed concern with the impact of the cul-de-sac as proposed. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson advised staff recommends the full cul-de-sac off of 148th <br />Avenue NW. He stated staff must recommend a full cul-de-sac and full right-of-way for any <br />subdivision. There are many plats that come into the City, ;and the same requirements must be <br />recommended for all of them._ <br />The Council requested direction from staff as.to <br />sac requirements if this were to be the Council's <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied s, <br />25 or 30 feet, and that the 24 foot segment be a li <br />Councilmember Cook suggested the cul-de-sac be <br />setback variance be granted to enable a plMIKE <br />F <br />the requirement of a full cul-de-sac. <br />The consensus of the Council was to <br />requirements in relation to the radius a <br />Further discussion: Councilmt <br />regarding the turn around so tl <br />responded in the affirmative. CE <br />intent was to bring the road thr <br />concessions are needed to make tl <br />Decorative/privacy fence <br />Mr. Schmidt indicated` he is Willi <br />need for all of the required" <br />allowed in the cul-de- <br />that the radius be increased to <br />so thAt,;th&fe is not a radius and that a <br />in and store T0`' feet of snow, -without <br />applicant on the cul-de-sac <br />r Stromm questioned if the findings must be clear <br />`"= <br />is not a 6 d" et. Public Works Director Kapler <br />[member Cook 'commented in relation to this, the original <br />to Ramsey Boulevard, which is no longer feasible, and <br />Iierty usable. <br />to put i' the decorative/privacy fence. He does not see the <br />ag, as much of it will not be seen due to the fence. <br />The consensus of the Council was to work with the applicant on the landscaping issues in <br />relation to the.privacy fence. -. , <br />Landscaping <br />The consensus of the. Couneii`was to direct Staff to work with the applicant with the placement <br />of taller canopy trees, -`rather" than the required shrubs. <br />Setbacks to residentially zoned properties to the north (bufferyard) <br />The consensus of the Council was to direct staff to work with the applicant in relation to a <br />variance for the bufferyard to the north. <br />City Council Work Session/October 19, 2004 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.