My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:34:07 PM
Creation date
11/5/2004 2:20:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/09/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
land. Currently the snowplows are dumping the snow and backing up, and there should be able <br />to be room allocated for the snow without a full 60-foot radius. He will agree to put in some type <br />of turn around for a plow, but he does not think it has to be 60 feet. The other issue is with the <br />ponding. He was at a meeting on October 6"' and was informed by the City Engineer that there <br />are two houses whose lowest floor elevation does now -not meet the 100-year flood elevation and <br />he is being asked to fix that. <br />The Engineer representing TSM Development, Inc. reviewed the elevations and explained TSM <br />Development has added their own pond to help the situation" <br />Mr. Schmidt stated the other thing is they are leaving-_ o <br />bounce. He finds it troubling that when he requestect't" <br />told the City does not have them. He stated it inatfai� <br />from the Regency Pond Development. That is putttng s <br />use of the property and a good fit for the City. He s�tatec <br />he understands there needs to be more meetings W. l <br />the cul-de-sac. Staff has said they need direction frontf <br />table this tonight and set it for the next meeting, and to <br />landscaping, fencing, and the turn around wrthWrt beir <br />be a takini,. He would like the Council toAluth nze star: <br />not plan to do any building until next year aid he had <br />negotiate some of the things with the CiteIe state€f;1Ye <br />to the south of him. The Planning Colt-,=,j"sion Was s <br />would not allow access there, and,'he is f ing to a'ccom <br />construct a privacy fence, that is ahoye and beyond. thF <br />He is willing to do a brick pillar grid wrought iron fens% <br />be able to discuss reducing, the setback with the cul:d <br />number of trees. <br />Mavor Gatne.e indicated.cul-de-sac <br />the 60 feet would be requiredt.... The <br />understands the access and whatthi <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook,' <br />for CNP Storage, case of TSKID& <br />Addition,, to allow staff to work wi <br />to the problems.. <br />. for snow plowing, and he would have to think <br />id fencing can be discussed. He commented he <br />with the outlot. <br />econded by Councilmember Strommen, to table the site plan <br />elopment, Inc., and the preliminary plat of Regency Pond 4tn <br />h the developer to come up with a compromise or agreement <br />Further Discussion: ' Councilmember Strommen suggested the Council comment on the issues <br />that staff would like direction on. Associate Planner Geisler requested direction regarding the <br />cul-de-sac. Councilmember Cook suggested a full cul-de-sac with a variance granted on the <br />setback. City Administrator Norman indicated a worksession discussion is needed for the <br />amount of direction that is needed. Mayor Gamec directed staff to place this discussion on the <br />agenda of the next worksession. Mr. Sclunidt requested the Council give staff direction to allow <br />him to grade on the site. The consensus; of the Council was not to allow any grading to be done <br />City Council/October 12, 2004 <br />Page 18 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.