My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:34:07 PM
Creation date
11/5/2004 2:20:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/09/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
install a uniform fence along the entire block of homes at the time of development. She stated <br />she hopes staff will look at that some day, as it is not becoming when every property has a <br />different type of fence. <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained staff keeps a similar list for R-2 and R-3 <br />standards, and this will be added to those lists for discussion. <br />COunCilmcinber Zimmennan concurred with Councilmember Kurak. <br />Mayor Ganiec inquired about the barbed wire requirements for a situation such as a 30-acre <br />parcel that has horses. <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained this ordinance is proposing to eliminate the <br />barbed wire on a residential property. <br />COUncillnember Cook commented barbed wire is not good fencing for horses. He stated he has a <br />concern about the three-foot setback, as there will be problems with maintaining the area on the <br />other side of the fence. <br />Mayor Gamec stated horses reach under the fence and eat the grass. He thinks the setback is <br />good so a person can get on both sides to maintain the fence without trespassing. <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Strommen, to introduce an <br />ordinance to amend the R-1 Residential District regulations. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Pearson, Strommen, Kurak, and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: Councilmember Cook. Absent: Councilmember Elvig. <br />Case #12: Adopt Ordinance Authorizing the Sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Business Park 95 <br />Second Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated on October 12, 2004, the Council introduced an ordinance to <br />authorize the sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Business Park 95 Second Addition. The ordinance is now <br />being presented for formal adoption. <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if this is for the expansion for Zero Zone. <br />City Attorney Goodrich responded in the affirmative. <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman, to adopt Ordinance <br />No. 04-42 authorizing the sale of the Lot 1, Block 1, Business Park 95 Second Addition, Anoka <br />County, Minnesota. <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: <br />City Council/October 26, 2004 <br />Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.