Laserfiche WebLink
lot. A lot could be created that would be 2.5 acres in size and meet all applicable setbacks. <br />However, the lot would be irregularly shaped. The parcel containing the homestead will exceed <br />the lot size minimum of the new ordinance. He said it is Staff's opinion that the fact that the <br />applicant doesn't have enough area for a proper lot size because he dedicated right-of-way as part <br />of the Echo Ridge Estates is a self-created hardship. Under Section 9.03.05 Subd. 2(b)(2)(c) a <br />variance cannot be granted if the special conditions and circumstances causing the undue <br />hardship result from the actions of the applicant. Staff recommends the variance be denied for <br />the following reasons: 1) In regard to the 4 in 40 density restriction portion of the variance, the <br />applicant is not showing a lot size of 10 acres in conformance with current regulations (both lots) <br />or in conformance with the 2.5 acre lot size minimum proposed under the Chapter 9 revisions <br />(one lot); 2) The inability to create a parcel that will meet the new code is partially a self-created <br />hardship, due to the fact that the applicant previously dedicated right-of-way as part of the Echo <br />Ridge Estates subdivision; 3) It is possible for the applicant to create a lot that meets the 2.5 acre <br />minimum proposed under the new code and that also meets all of the required setback <br />minimums for the existing homestead. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Board Member Kociscak asked if Mr. Longfield was planning to move his septic system since <br />the setbacks are not met. <br /> <br />Bob Longfield, 5751 177th Avenue N.W., answered he would prefer not to, but if that is required, <br />he will move it. He noted the power lines go through the property, which is where he tried to <br />make the natural break. He said he was concemed with who would maintain the road. He <br />would prefer to not put a road through. He added he would prefer to create a buildable lot rather <br />than an outlot. He said he intended to preserve his property. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon pointed out one of the recommendations includes the requirement of <br />a 66-foot right-of-way along the southern edge of the property for the minor subdivision. He <br />said this is what Mr. Longfield does not want to give up. <br /> <br />Mr. Longfield stated he obtained signatures from all the neighbors and they were in support of <br />this proposal. He provided a copy of the signatures to the Chairperson. He also confirmed he is <br />the fee owner. <br /> <br />Lynn Ackerman, 17801 St. Francis Boulevard, stated the south end of her property abuts the <br />north end of the Longfield property. She stated she moved to Ramsey specifically to have 10 or <br />more acres. She said her largest concern is the letter from the City stating that city sewer and <br />water will be installed along the northwest comer of his property. She said she was not sure <br />where the property line was and was concerned about losing their trees. She also questioned the <br />size of the acres, whether they would be independent or with city sewer and water, and whether <br />city sewer and water will be a requirement. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />