My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/01/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/01/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:10:48 PM
Creation date
8/14/2017 10:44:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/01/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Bauer asked for final thoughts from the Commission. There were no additional <br />comments. <br />The Commission offered their support to the Sketch Plan. <br />5.04: Review Sketch Plan for Estates of Silver Oaks 2 u Addition (Project No. 17-119); <br />Case of Marcel Eibensteiner. <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating the purpose of this file is to review the <br />official Sketch Plan prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., Roshell Engineering, and Royal Oaks <br />Realty for the purpose of an eight (8) lot subdivision located on Lithium Street NW. The Sketch <br />Plan submitted includes nine (9) sheets. The Sketch Plan Review process affords the Planning <br />Commission the opportunity to provide early direction on the layout of the proposed plat, before <br />the Developer prepares detailed Preliminary Plat plans. A key decision will occur at Preliminary <br />Plat, in which the layout will be approved, subject to approving final construction plans and Final <br />Plat documents. At that time, the City will review items including, but not limited to, Grading <br />Plan, Utility Plan, Landscape Plan, and Street Light Plan. Staff discussed the sketch plan further <br />and requested feedback from the Commission. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner VanScoy understood the development would have a permanent cul-de-sac. He <br />asked if staff had considered a future connection to 164th Avenue. <br />City Planner Anderson stated should the area to the north ever develop, staff would recommend a <br />connection to 164th Avenue be made. <br />John Peterson, the applicant, commented on the tree survey he had completed for the <br />development. He believed that his plan was being very sensitive to the adjacent developments. <br />Commissioner Nosan thanked Mr. Peterson for working so hard to preserve the trees within this <br />development. <br />The Commission offered their support to the Sketch Plan. <br />5.05: Review Concept Plan for Bunker Lake Industrial Park; Case of PSD, LLC <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to review a concept plan in design stages for Bunker Lake Industrial Park by PSD, LLC. <br />This is not yet a formal application. The intent is to get preliminary feedback to the Developer <br />before a formal land use application is submitted. <br />Planning Commission/June 1, 2017 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.