Laserfiche WebLink
Layout <br />The following design standards are required for the various housing types proposed within the <br />development. Please note that due to the variety of housing types, it is difficult to apply a single - <br />set of layout standards to the project. Any perceived deviation to City Code appears to be <br />reasonable with the utilization of a Planned Unit Development. A significant portion of the <br />project area is being preserved for open space, a key component of a PUD Approval, and a <br />requirement of the R-2 Residential District. <br />Traditional Single-Family/Small Lot Single -Family and Villa Lots <br />Miscellaneous Standards <br />Attached and Detached Townhomes <br />Lot size <br />None <br />Minimum density (net) <br />3.0 <br />Maximum density (net) <br />7.0 <br />Lot width <br />None <br />Building setback from public street right- <br />of -way <br />25 feet <br />Building setback from private street <br />measured from back of curb <br />25 feet <br />Building setback from exterior <br />development boundary line <br />30 feet <br />25 feet (detached) <br />Minimum separation between buildings, <br />20 feet <br />15 feet (detached) <br />including any appurtenances thereto (i.e., <br />patios, decks) <br />Parking node setback from exterior <br />development boundary line <br />30 feet <br />Parking node setback from structure <br />15 feet <br />Maximum lot coverage <br />35% <br />Maximum building height (measured from <br />35 feet <br />mean ground level to mean gable) <br />Accessory structure setback (measured <br />from the development boundary line) <br />30 feet <br />Maximum number of units per structure <br />81 (detached) <br />Open space required <br />40% general open space 10% of which must <br />be identifiable community space <br />The only deficiency in the above table would be the minimum separation between buildings. The <br />Pk lining Cal miz ion and City Council lava altvaAy zam is ixoject in conaap, ;Ind ppaand <br />generally supportive of the ovm11 am -coach. The PUD Qppcars to be an zwopriate tool in thin <br />instanceThe Planning Commission recommended annroval of the PUD as an annronriate tool to <br />deviate from this standard. <br />It is our mission to work together to responsibly grow our community, and to provide quality, cost- <br />effective ective and efficient government services. <br />Riverstone Addition Planning Division Review April 28, 2017 (Preliminary Plat) <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />