Laserfiche WebLink
as part of the reconstruction of 166th Ave NW. The sidewalk terminates just east of the western boundary of the <br />Subject Property due to the presence of wetland. <br />The Applicant is proposing two (2) rain gardens to address the Lower Rum River Watershed Management <br />Organization's infiltration requirements. Staff is not opposed to this approach but additional details are required on <br />each of the rain gardens as outlined in the Staff Review Letter. <br />The Environmental Policy Board (EPB) reviewed the Tree Preservation Plan and the request for a variance to the <br />lot depth standard at their March meeting. The EPB recommended approval of the Tree Preservation Plan <br />contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter. The EPB also recommended approval of the variance <br />request, as they felt that there would still be viable buildable area for the future homeowners to install features such <br />as a deck and/or reasonably sized accessory building without encroaching into the required wetland, wetland <br />setback of floodway. <br />The proposed three (3) lot single family residential subdivision is a reasonable use of the property and appears to be <br />generally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Each of the three lots would still be two (2) plus acres in <br />size, albeit much of that consisting of wetland area, which is larger than the abutting parcels to the north and east <br />and the parcel to the west, owned by the City, is essentially all wetland too. The Subject Property is rather unique <br />with respect to the overall abundance of area encumbered by wetland and floodplain and the fact that five (5) sets of <br />utility stubs were provided as part of a previous road reconstruction project (and only three [3] are proposed to be <br />used). <br />Alternatives: <br />Alternative 1: Approve the Final Plat for Homestead Road Addition. This is a challenging site to work with based <br />on the amount of wetland and floodplain and the proposed subdivision seems a reasonable use of the property. The <br />Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. Thus, Staff supports this alternative. <br />Alternative 2: Do not approve the Final Plat. Staff is of the opinion that the Applicant has been reasonable with the <br />proposed subdivision rather than attempting to fully utilize all five (5) sets of utility stubs. Additionally, the <br />Planning Commission did approve a Variance to lot depth for Lots 1 and 3, contingent upon approval of the <br />Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat, which the City Council approved in April <br />and therefore, Staff does not support this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. There are no City funds <br />proposed to be utilized for the construction of this project. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Maintenance Agreement contingent <br />upon compliance with the Staff Review Letter and subject to review and approval as to legal form by the City <br />Attorney. <br />Action: <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #17-06-137 granting approval of the Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Rain <br />Garden Maintenance Agreement for Homestead Road Addition, subject to review and approval as to legal form by <br />the City Attorney and verification of the Lateral Benefit Charge for both sewer and water. <br />Site Location Map <br />Plan Set <br />Staff Review Letter <br />Attachments <br />