Laserfiche WebLink
4. WHY SHOULDN'T THE DEVELOPERS PAY FOR EVERYTHING? <br />(How will this arterial infrastructure project effect land values in the business park?) <br />Bunker Lake Boulevard/ Puma Street are considered arterial infrastructure/ trunk infrastructure/ <br />collector roadways. These roadways are a designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) route —much like <br />Alpine, Variolite, Sunwood, or 167th Ave. Bunker/ Puma proposed improvements include "trunk" <br />water/ sewer lines; which are identified in the city's adopted Comprehensive Water/Sewer Plans. <br />In summary, the arterial infrastructure proposed for Bunker/Puma will serve more than just the <br />immediately adjacent parcels. <br />RE THE BUSINESS PARK AREA <br />Market rate asking prices for raw, shovel -ready, industrial land in the Ramsey area is $2.00- <br />$3.50 per square foot. <br />If Hageman Holdings was asked to pay for 100% of all new arterial infrastructure running <br />adjacent to their site, land prices are predicted to range from $2.00-$3.15 per square foot <br />MINIMUM. This price does not include the cost of any needed internal infrastructure, time - <br />value -of -money, broker fees, or profit -margin for Hageman Holdings, etc. Likely, if this was <br />the scenario, asking prices would escalate well over $3.00 psf. <br />Elk River, Ramsey's biggest economic development competitor, has been listing industrial land <br />for $2.50 psf, before use of economic development incentives. In some cases, via use of <br />economic development incentives, said $2.50 psf priced land has been written down to <br />significantly lower prices (less than $1.00 psf), or in some cases, even down to zero. <br />In order to stay competitive, based on asking prices, Ramsey should stay below $3.00 psf, and <br />ideally be closer to $2.00 psf, for asking prices. Additionally, the City should be prepared to use <br />economic development incentives (such as TIF). <br />Hageman Holdings has set their asking prices from $2.25 to $2.75 psf, which includes existing <br />assessments (i.e. 2013 Legacy project assessments are NOT an additional cost to a buyer). <br />Hageman Holdings has also indicated, they understand, that if additional NEW assessments are <br />placed against their property (for this proposed arterial infrastructure project), they will likely <br />need to discount that value from their existing asking prices, in order to stay relevant/ <br />competitive in the marketplace (i.e. take less for the land). Hageman Holdings has indicated <br />they understand that need, and are okay with that approach, and understand they need to stay <br />at the $2.25-$2.75 asking prices. Hageman Holdings has indicated they are willing to sign <br />another Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlining that position. <br />Lastly, it should be noted, asking prices are different than what price a deal can be done —likely, <br />Hageman would be willing to sell at a price closer to $2.00 psf (depending on the project/ <br />negotiation). <br />STAFF NOTE: the new Hageman Holdings assessments are estimated to range between <br />$280K to $350K total. If that new assessment is spread across the former school site, it <br />comes out to 10 to 13 cents per square foot, or $4,516 to $5,645 per acre. <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />