Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair VanScoy, Commissioners Surma, Nosan, Anderson, <br />Brauer, and Gengler. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Bauer. <br /> <br />Vice Chair VanScoy closed the public hearing closed at 7:35 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br /> <br />Vice Chair VanScoy stated he was most concerned with the safety issues regarding the proposed <br />cul-de-sac size and for this reason, explained he would not be supporting the variance request. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill suggested that if the Commission was going to deny <br />the variance request that Items 2 through 5 be removed from Resolution #17-08-196. <br /> <br />Motion by Vice Chair VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Gengler, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Resolution #17-08-195 approving unfavorable findings of fact #0982 for the cul- <br />de-sac bulb size variance. <br /> <br />Further discussion <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the language within the unfavorable <br />findings of fact. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer recommended the last two findings be removed and that an additional <br />finding be added stating: It is the opinion of the Fire Chief that this cul-de-sac does not meet the <br />minimum specifications for fire apparatus access. <br /> <br />Vice Chair VanScoy and Commission Gengler accepted this friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair VanScoy, Commissioners Gengler, Anderson, Brauer, <br />Nosan, and Surma. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Bauer. <br /> <br />Motion by Vice Chair VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Resolution #17-08-196 denying the variance for cul-de-sac bulb size, striking <br />Items 2 through 5. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair VanScoy, Commissioners Nosan, Anderson, Brauer, <br />Gengler, and Surma. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Bauer. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the alternative plans submitted by the applicant. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted staff would be reviewing these plans with the <br />applicant in the coming weeks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer thanked the applicant for bringing in an alternative. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission / August 3, 2017 <br />Page 5 of 16 <br /> <br />