Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Community Development Director Gladhill summarized the comments made by the Commission <br />to enhance the rear façade of the proposed homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Surma stated he would like to see the buildings match and compliment the other <br />homes in the area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nosan supported these homes blending in with the adjacent neighborhood as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gengler believed it would be difficult to make a decision on the proposed models <br />without further information. <br /> <br />Vice Chair VanScoy stated he would like more articulation on the rear façade. <br /> <br />Bill Gleason explained the drawings presented to the Commission were not of the greatest <br />quality. He commented further on how the rear facades and plantings would be enhanced. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Nosan, seconded by Commissioner Gengler, to recommend that City <br />Council authorize the proposed model homes for Vistas at North Commons. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair VanScoy, Commissioners Nosan, Gengler, Anderson, <br />and Surma. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Bauer and Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />6.04: Review Sketch Plan for Davis Addition; Case of Green Valley Greenhouse <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the staff report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to consider a lot split that will ultimately allow for the future expansion of Green Valley <br />Greenhouse. Ideally, the lot split would occur concurrently with a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment from Low Density Residential to something that would allow the expansion of this <br />existing commercial greenhouse. However, the time to consider and approve will take a longer <br />period of time than Green Valley Greenhouse has with an existing purchase agreement. A closing <br />is scheduled for the end of August. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported staff believes that any liability can be <br />covered in a Development Agreement. By approving this lot split, there is no approval of any site <br />plan for expansion of Green Valley Greenhouse. Green Valley will still need a Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment and Site Plan Approval prior to any construction activities that would expand <br />the footprint of the existing facility. Staff recommends approval of this Plat, contingent upon the <br />Applicant entering into a Development Agreement with the City and the completion of a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment prior to any actual construction activities. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission / August 3, 2017 <br />Page 12 of 16 <br /> <br />