Laserfiche WebLink
7.07: Consider Adoption of Resolution #17-07-162 Approving Preliminary Plat for Cole <br /> Addition (Project No. 17-132); Case of Byron and Lynn Cole <br /> Community Development Intern Henderson reviewed the staff report and noted that as long as <br /> the plans can be revised in accordance with the Staff Review Letter, including solving the <br /> drainage (and easement vacation) concern and the cul-de-sac design, staff would recommend <br /> approval of the Preliminary Plat. He stated that if the revisions result in a change in lot <br /> configuration, number of lots and/or deficiencies in the lot size, the revised Preliminary Plat <br /> could be routed back through the Planning Commission for consideration. He stated that a <br /> variance for the cul-de-sac size will be heard at the August Planning Commission meeting; <br /> noting that both cul-de-sac size and stormwater management appear to have the potential to <br /> result in a net loss of a buildable lot. He stated that it may be reasonable to reduce the net <br /> buildable lots by one to better accommodate stormwater needs and cul-de-sac size (if the <br /> variance is not supported by the Planning Commission). <br /> Councilmember Kuzma asked for additional details on the contingencies for the cul-de-sac. <br /> Community Development Intern Henderson provided additional details on the options for the <br /> cul-de-sac. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the Preliminary Plat can be approved <br /> today and the Staff Review Letter directs the applicant to solve for the deficiency. He noted that <br /> could occur with the applicant amending the plat to have a larger cul-de-sac should the variance <br /> not be approved by the Planning Commission and Council in August. <br /> Councilmember Shryock stated that this looks like a subdivision of private property and there <br /> will be additional lots that head into the cul-de-sac and asked if those will have the opportunity <br /> to develop. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the property owner to the west has stated <br /> that they may want to develop in the future and would like to connect through that cul-de-sac. <br /> He stated that the City has done a lot of cul-de-sac speculation in the past assuming that the <br /> neighboring property will develop and that property never develops. He stated that a smaller cul- <br /> de-sac often works best when a project is being phased rather than relying on a neighboring <br /> parcel to develop. <br /> Brian Cole, 6915 169th Ave NW, stated that this goes back to 2005 when John Peterson <br /> requested the Brookfield Addition. He stated that he was the only one in his neighborhood that <br /> stood up in favor of that development. He stated that change is coming and everyone around him <br /> has quarter acre lots, while he has 2.5 acres. He stated that he worked with Mr. Peterson and <br /> everything had been prepared to develop his property. He stated that the market then froze and <br /> so the development of his property also froze. He stated that he has been very upfront with <br /> everyone that has moved into his neighborhood about his desire to subdivide. He stated that he <br /> would like to have seven lots and noted that it would not be cost effective to move forward with <br /> six lots. He respectfully requested that the City be supportive of his request. <br /> City Council/July 25,2017 <br /> Page 11of17 <br />