My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/12/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 09/12/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:37:55 PM
Creation date
9/13/2017 9:03:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/12/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
671
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Assessments <br />The City's adopted Special Assessments Policy (attached) specifies that special assessments shall pay for 25% of <br />eligible street reconstruction improvement costs. Special assessments are calculated using methods resulting in <br />reasonable and equitable distribution of assessments that are uniform upon the same class of properties within the <br />assessable area. The test for determining the validity of a special assessment is whether the improvement for which <br />the assessment was levied has increased the market value of the property against which the assessment was levied <br />in at least the amount of the assessment. <br />Ramsey's Special Assessments Policy identifies three optional methods for calculating assessments. A total of 9 <br />benefiting properties were identified along this segment of Sunwood Drive. All properties are zoned El or E2 <br />(industrial) so only two assessment methods are recommended; the "adjusted front footage" method and the "area" <br />method. <br />Staff originally considered impacts of both methods as they would be applied in the current context of the policy. <br />The adjusted front footage method resulted in less variability between assessments ($9K - $40K), while the area <br />method resulted in greater variability ($3K - $42K). Staff initially recommended using the area method since it <br />appeared to better assign benefit based on lot geometry, which seemed to make sense for this project considering <br />the significant differences in lot depths along the corridor. However, based on feedback received from the City's <br />consultant that has prepared the benefit appraisal consultation reports for recent street reconstruction projects in <br />Ramsey (Patchin, Messner, Dodd and Brumm), and based on feedback received from other cities that have assessed <br />industrial parcels for street reconstruction improvements, the adjusted front footage method was used to calculate <br />preliminary assessments. <br />Additionally, Patchin, Messner, Dodd and Brumm calculated estimated special benefits for each assessable <br />property, which was added to the preliminary assessment roll. Staff then applied the lesser of the calculated front <br />footage assessment and the estimated special benefit to determine the preliminary assessment for each assessable <br />property per the attached Feasibility Report. <br />All project costs are eligible for special assessments since the street was reconstructed to its pre-existing width, and <br />since the old and new pavement sections are both 10-ton designs. <br />As stated earlier, Connexus Energy is still voicing concerns with their proposed assessment. Connexus Energy's <br />concerns primarily focus on the fact that the parcel proposed to be assessed in undeveloped. Staff met with <br />Connexus Energy representatives on several occasions to discuss their assessment. However, based on feedback <br />from our consulting appraiser, Patchin, Messner, Dodd and Brumm, as well as from other cities that utilize <br />assessments who do not appear to assess properties differently due to development status. Staff therefore believes <br />Connexus Energy's proposed assessment is reasonable. In summary, assessments were calculated based on the <br />highest and best use of the property. <br />Connexus Energy plans to address the Public Works Committee on September 19, 2017, to discuss their proposed <br />special assessment. However, at the time this report was prepared no formal objections had been received City <br />Staff. Should any formal objections be received from property owners prior to the Assessment Hearing, or if the <br />Public Works Committee recommends any adjustments be made to the final Assessment Roll, Staff will update the <br />City Council on such matters before the Assessment Hearing is conducted. <br />The estimated assessable project cost based on the contract amount is $503,543.59. This results in a total <br />assessment amount of $125,885.90 based on 25% of eligible project costs. Special assessments for each benefiting <br />property varies based on front frontage. <br />A special benefit consultation report is being completed for this project to help provide proof of benefit. The results <br />of this report, which is being finalized at this time, along with final special assessment amounts, will be presented <br />during the Assessment Hearing on October 10, 2017. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.