Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he cannot provide an opinion at this point and would like <br />more time to process all the information to understand what the underlying reasons are for the <br />concerns. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that this seems to fit pretty well with what was approved with <br />Capstone and would seem to be an extension of that. He noted that the decision for Capstone <br />was not slaved over, most likely because of the lack of neighbors that came forward. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau agreed that is what he is struggling with. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the super majority of the Capstone parcel <br />was already zoned correctly for that development but acknowledged that a Comprehensive Plan <br />amendment was needed for a portion of that site that was designated commercial. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that the landowner has land that he wants to sell to a developer <br />and acknowledged the concern of the neighbors but noted that there is a balance there. <br />Lonnie Brock asked if there could be a signal light at Alpine and Highway 10, noting that you <br />cannot get onto Highway 10 from Alpine because of the traffic. <br />Mayor Strommen replied that the City is in the business of eliminating the lights on Highway 10 <br />rather than putting more lights onto the highway. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that there is a Highway 10 planning study <br />which identifies an improvement for that intersection outside of a stoplight. <br />7.06: Review Inland Group Proposed Project <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report. He noted that the Planning Commission and <br />EDA have reviewed this information and based on the input from the developer, EDA and <br />Planning Commission, Concept Layout C appears to be the preferred site. He asked for input <br />from the Council. <br />Keith James, Inland Group, thanked the Council for their time. He noted that this is his third <br />time out to meet a body of the Ramsey government and stated that he continues to be impressed. <br />He stated that Inland began about 30 years ago with a focus on multi -family construction. He <br />stated that they branched out into affordable senior housing as well as traditional retirement <br />housing. He stated that there seemed to be a gap in the affordable senior housing and the <br />traditional retirement housing which left a gap for seniors in the middle of those two groups that <br />did not qualify for the income limits of the affordable product and did not need the service <br />provided in traditional retirement communities/assisted living. He stated that the Affinity brand <br />was then born. He stated that they came to Minnesota with their product and they like to have a <br />node within a market. He provided a summary of the units that would be available at the <br />development. He noted that the Affinity product does not use an activities staff person to draw <br />people out and instead use a grassroots effort. He explained that there are many residents with <br />gardening knowledge and therefore they are beneficial to the gardening program. He noted that <br />City Council / August 22, 2017 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />