My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:37:14 PM
Creation date
9/13/2017 9:18:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 08/08/2017 <br />Submitted For: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />By: Eric Maass, Community Development <br />7. 1. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #17-08-192 Granting Preliminary Plat approval to Bunker Lake Industrial Park (Project <br />#17-127); Case ofPSD, LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review the preliminary plat for a new business park being proposed near the southeast <br />corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Puma St. The total area is about forty-five (45) acres in size, but only a <br />portion of that is being proposed for development initially. It should be noted that the City Council has approved a <br />Tree Clearing and Grading Agreement for the Developer to allow some of the site preparation work to begin in <br />advance of final approvals to aid in getting Lots 1 & 2 pad ready as soon as possible. <br />The request is being brought before the City's Planning Commission on August 3, 2017, and as a result meeting <br />minutes are not yet available. Note - the sequence of approval is outside of the City's standard review process. City <br />Council has previously agreed to streamline the review of this project where allowed under City Code. Staff is <br />staggering several applications for this project parallel in the review process. However, it is noted that this does <br />result in additional contingencies of approval and difficulty including Planning Commission Minutes in City <br />Council cases. <br />Notification: <br />City Staff attempted to notify all property owners within 700 feet of the Subject Property of the request via U.S. <br />mail and published a notice of public hearing in the Anoka Union Herald, the City's official newspaper. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Generally speaking, the proposed development meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District. On <br />February 14, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment to guide the property for Business Park. <br />The property is currently zoned for B-2 Business District and its anticipated that the developer will request a <br />rezoning to E-1: Employment with the Final Plat and Site Plan Application. The requested preliminary plat has been <br />reviewed based on the bulk standards of the E-1 Employment District. <br />The proposed business park is proposed to be serviced by two new streets, Jackal Street NW and 147th Lane NW. <br />Jackal Street is proposed to run north to south and connect Bunker Lake Blvd with the proposed 147th Lane NW <br />running east to west through roughly parallel and about 450 feet south of Bunker Lake Road. All access for the two <br />buildable lots will be gained from 147th Lane NW. The proposed streets are satisfactory to staff. <br />City utilities are proposed to be extended as part of this project to service the industrial lots. No drainage and utility <br />easements are currently shown on the preliminary plat; however standards drainage and utility easements shall be <br />dedicated on Lot 1 and Lot 2 of the proposed buildable lots and over the entirety of the stormwater pond being <br />constructed on Outlot C. <br />The Natural Resource Inventory (NRI) indicates that the land included in this proposed development is not located <br />in an area considered to be either an exceptional, high, moderate, or low are of natural quality. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.