My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:37:14 PM
Creation date
9/13/2017 9:18:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Strommen confirmed that the Council would like to participate and there is consensus to <br />contribute $2,000 as proposed. <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted that the stormwater management fund would be used for the <br />contribution. <br />2.02: Discuss Prosecution Legal Services Contract <br />Police Chief Katers reviewed the staff report and his recommendation to continue the current <br />services and begin the RFP process for prosecution services. <br />Mayor Strommen asked and received confirmation that the prosecution services would be <br />separate from the civil legal services. <br />Councilmember Kuzma agreed that it would be healthy to go through the RFP process. He <br />asked if it would make sense to go out for RFP on both civil and prosecution services or whether <br />it would make sense to keep those separate. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that he does not have a good answer for that. He explained that civil <br />and prosecution services are very different services. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that perhaps they should just do the RFP for prosecution services <br />at this time and wait to do the RFP on civil services. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he would be worried about duplicating the effort and would <br />rather combine the efforts to avoid duplication of staff time and interview time. <br />Mayor Strommen asked if there is a time savings in going through the process for both at the <br />same time. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that the police department is very involved with the prosecution <br />services while other departments are greatly involved with the civil services. He stated that in <br />the past there was a joint RFP for both services and then multiple staff and Councilmembers <br />were involved in the interview process. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the services are fairly distinct as the prosecution service <br />works directly with the police depailinent, therefore firms that specialize in just prosecution <br />focus only on that service and therefore have expertise in that area. He stated that the civil <br />service works as the City Attorney and works directly with the staff and Council. He stated that <br />perhaps it would be more efficient to just focus on the prosecution services at this time, as that <br />would lessen the involvement of the Council. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that in his opinion there was not a time <br />savings in lumping the two services together and it actually seemed to cause some confusion in <br />the process. <br />City Council Work Session / July 25, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.