My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:37:14 PM
Creation date
9/13/2017 9:18:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jason Aarsvold, Ehlers, presented the results of the bond sales. He stated that with the great <br />bond rating of the City, the City was able to receive three bidders noting that the low bidder had <br />an interest rate of 1.938 percent. He noted that the competitive bidding resulted in the City <br />having about $19,000 more to work with for project dollars because they received a lower <br />interest rate than projected. <br />Motion by Councilmember Kuzma, seconded by Councilmember Shryock, to Adopt Resolution <br />#17-07-179 Providing for the Issuance and Sale of $895,000 General Obligation Street <br />Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2017A, Pledging Special Assessments and Levying a Tax for the <br />Payment Thereof. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Kuzma, Shryock, Johns, <br />LeTourneau, Riley, and Williams. Voting No: None. <br />7.05: Riverstone Development Purchase Agreement (Portions may be closed to the public) <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama reviewed the staff report and <br />stated that staff is comfortable with this proposed purchase agreement as it fits within the City's <br />policies and procedures. He stated that the land proceeds are to be dedicated to the City's Park <br />Fund and CBRE commission will be paid via land proceeds, per the listing agreement. He stated <br />that this transaction is a direct result of the City's desire to realign Puma Street, noting that <br />Capstone did not seek the purchase of this property originally and explaining that the City made <br />this request/suggestion. He stated that the sale price matches the market rate. He noted that staff <br />does not feel a need to go into closed session but if the Council has the desire to further negotiate <br />price, he would suggest going into closed session. He noted that the EDA discussed this case on <br />July 13th, in open session, and was generally supportive of this purchase agreement and is excited <br />for the Riverstone project. He stated that the EDA recommends that the City sell this land to <br />Riverstone. He noted that the EDA did specifically suggest staff counter-offer Riverstone's <br />original offer price, which was $25,000 per acre. He stated that staff did provide Riverstone with <br />a counter-offer of $35,000 per acre but Riverstone stated that they are not willing to accept the <br />EDA's counter-offer as they believe the market price is $25,000, based upon recent land <br />transactions in the immediate area. <br />Councilmember Williams stated that they did review this in the EDA and the EDA was generally <br />supportive. She stated that she raised the concern that this parcel has the same market price <br />because of the higher density proposed and the location at the corner of Puma and Alpine makes <br />it more desirable than the interior parcels. She stated that she believes that the land value would <br />be higher than the interior lots but acknowledged that there are other factors that come into play. <br />Mayor Strommen asked Capstone to come forward and explain why the counter-offer was not <br />accepted. <br />Steve Bona, Capstone Homes, stated that the property that is currently contracted had a higher <br />underlying zoning than this property and because of that the reverse argument is true that the <br />interior is more valuable because of the zoning. He stated that this takes into account where all <br />City Council / July 25, 2017 <br />Page 8 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.