Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Planner Anderson stated that he is not requesting formal action because the information was <br />submitted to close to the meeting date and therefore the Board did not have time to thoroughly <br />review the information as it was just presented tonight. <br /> <br />5.05: Receive Update on The COR Interim Development Plan <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of this case is to <br />review a preliminary draft of The COR Interim Development Plan, which essentially puts into <br />motion a more formal amendment to the Master Plan. He noted that details of the <br />recommendations prepared by the Planning Commission over a series of workshops were attached <br />to the case. He noted that the direction form the April 25, 2017 Joint Work Session was to review <br />this draft with the advisory Boards and Commissions. He stated that the draft was review by the <br />Economic Development Authority on May 25, 2017 and by the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />at their June 8, 2017 meeting. He advised that staff will be seeking authorization for public <br />comment on the draft in July. <br /> <br />Board Member Valentine commented that the plan is coming along nicely. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stodola asked for more information on the boundaries of The COR. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson provided the boundaries of The COR, explaining that some of The COR <br />zoning extends past those boundaries. <br /> <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that one of the driving factors of the Council is the market, <br />noting that the development will have to be market driven. He explained that the big box retail <br />that was originally desired will not fit into The COR because of the challenges that exist lying <br />between two retail nodes and other market factors. He noted that the other factors that bring in <br />business is density and that is why additional housing is being considered. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson stated that while residents have said they do not want more apartments in <br />The COR, additional rooftops are needed to attract business and that is the quickest method. He <br />noted that the original plan for The COR included apartments because that would concentrate <br />density and allow other portions of the City to remain more rural. <br /> <br />Councilmember LeTourneau noted that this has been a balance approach with market rate <br />apartments. <br /> <br />Board Member Valentine stated that the planning for growth in the community has been done well. <br /> <br />Board Member Hiatt stated that the challenge in The COR is the density focus and balancing that <br />with an environmental aspect. He provided examples of additional plantings that the Board has <br />been able to negotiate on more dense projects. He noted that often with big box retail there is less <br />landscaping and stated that in smaller retail settings you are able to maintain that landscaping to <br />make it more appealing. <br /> <br />City Planner Anderson provided additional details on the Lake Itasca Greenway Corridor which <br />plays into the concepts. <br /> <br />Environmental Policy Board / June 19, 2017 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br />