Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Acting Chairperson Valentine, Board Member Hiatt, Anderson, <br />Bernard, and Covart. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Stodola and Board Member <br />Trossen. <br />Acting Chairperson Valentine recognized that the stormwater design is not the purview of the <br />Board but asked for some details. <br />City Planner Anderson highlighted the proposed stormwater pond and provided additional details. <br />5.02: Consider Landscape Plan and Tree Inventory for Bunker Lake Business Park <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of the case is to review <br />the Landscape Plan and Tree Inventory for a new Business Park being proposed near the southeast <br />corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Puma Street. The total area is about 45 acres in size, but <br />only a portion of that is being proposed for initial development. He noted that the City Council <br />has approved a Tree Clearing and Grading Agreement for the developer to allow some of the site <br />preparation work to begin in advance of final approvals to aid in getting the pads for Lots 1 & 2 <br />ready as soon as possible. He provided additional details on the proposed Landscape Plan. He <br />recommended approval of the Landscape Plan and Tree Inventory Plan contingent upon the <br />revisions outlined in the Staff Review Letter. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked for clarification on which plan is displayed currently on the <br />monitor. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that the plan shown on the screen is the Landscape Plan proposed <br />by the applicant. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that the trees shown seem to exceed the requirements and <br />asked where the missing trees would be. <br />City Planner Anderson noted that the inches fall short, as the applicant is proposing about 700 <br />inches of trees which falls well short of the 2,500 inches required. He noted that when the <br />remainder of the site is developed, each site will have additional landscaping for each site which <br />will contribute towards the total number needed. <br />Board Member Hiatt asked if there is a suggestion of staff as to where additional trees could be <br />planted. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that the southern boundary of the parking lot and around the ponding <br />basin could use additional trees but noted that payment into the City forestry fund would also be <br />an option. <br />Acting Chairperson Valentine asked if a memorandum of understanding could be used to keep the <br />developer on their toes as the business park builds momentum and continues to be built out. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that the details would be included in the development agreement. <br />He stated that certain percentages of landscaping could be designated for the future parcels. <br />Environmental Policy Board / July 17, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />