Laserfiche WebLink
200] Comprehensive <br />Ame,nded February 26, 2002 <br /> <br />5. Current Corridor Issues <br /> <br />A public meeting on river corridor issues was held April 30, 1998 and was attended <br />by nearly 40 Ramsey res/dents and landowners. Although the. City advertised the <br />meeting to all its residents, nearly. 90°,/0 of the participants were residents or <br />landowners within the Critical Area Co~d0r..Because the attendance was heavily <br />representative of the landowner interests, the key issue of protection of private <br />prope~/ owner rights consumed much of the meeting. However, other objectives <br />were identified within this meeting that reaffirmed directives, which are consistent <br />with tile intent of the t'v[NP,2L:~ Comprehensive Management Plan. A strong ef£ort <br />should be made to preserve the natural resource base and to protect and improve water <br />quali .ty. Some support was given for a continuous trail corridor that linked to greater <br />Ramsey and neighboring communities: however, a strong coalition also supported no <br />trails. Many of the issues discussed at the April meeting were also discussed at <br />previous .public meetings and information gathering sessions. The following list <br />identifies the key issues needed to be address within the Critical Area Plan: <br /> <br />a) Key Issues <br /> <br />1. Protection of private property owners rights which allow reasonable use of <br /> land and prevent damage t.o land. <br /> <br />Preservation of open space and natural resources to protect water quality, <br />wildlife habitat, and rural character. <br /> <br />improved public access .through a continuous trail corridor sensitive to <br />property, owner concerns. The critical issues to the trail corridor involve <br />location of trail corridor, its use (bicycle, walking, hiking, rollerblading, <br />etc...), public safety and protection of vandalism to agriculture and private <br />property. Also of critical importance to this issue is public involvement in. <br />the decision making process. This plan does not identify a specific location of <br />a trail corridor; rather it will establish a general approach to identifying use <br />and location. <br /> <br />/Jr. <br /> <br />Although this issue is much broader than just the ~ff, IRtLA Corridor, a future <br />bridge crossing should be addressed in the plan. Criteria for the location and <br />design of a potential Mississippi River Bridge Crossing, if one should be <br />planned, is of critical importance. <br /> <br />.An issue not discussed at the public meeting is-the design, function and land <br />use along US Highway 10. Tile issues ~vith the' Highway corridor are relative <br />to tral-'±~c congestion and its impact on air quality, and problems associated <br />with :strip commercial development including poor image, traf~Sc accidents <br />:md interruptions and with non-point source pollution emanating ~'rom used <br />c:tr lots ,)la unimproved sur'Gce parking lots. These issues' slnottld be <br />addressed through the Highway Corridor study recommended ~'or LiS <br />Highway l I). <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />