My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/18/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/18/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:50:36 AM
Creation date
11/12/2004 2:56:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
11/18/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ostrun*t thought a ~brt might be fl~n also. <br /> <br />Chairperson Join*ts liked the idea of a meandering trail tl'n:oughout the park with the play <br />equipn*tent spread out instead of a rectangulm- area with the play equipment enclosed. <br /> <br />Case #2: Review Parks Pro,jects in CIP <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton presented the Park CEP Projects to the Commission for review~ <br /> <br />Some of' the park district fired balances are low because there has not been much development. <br />The fired balances are fi'om 4/20/04. Staff will bring the most cun'ent figures to the meeting. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer 17 Linton showed photos of the parks and maps of projected projects in the City. <br />He stated Elrncrest Park Construction was picked up this week. The contractor installed Class 5 <br />and Concrete Curb and Gutter, which required substantial staff time. <br /> <br />Chairperson Jolms stated she was satisfied where they were going with 2005-2006 projects but <br />she thought some of`the numbers had changed.' <br /> <br />Civil Engineer [[ Linton stated he did not update the numbers, the number shown were what they <br />projected a year ago. <br /> <br />Chairperson Jo?ms thought the C~ for the short time was fine. She would like to discuss years <br />five to ten. She explained they used to have their own plan for projects and would like to get <br />back to doing that each yem'. She wanted them to consider doing a Master Parks Plan and <br />implementaticm of the Master Park Trail. She stated they should t~ to figure out where they <br />have f`unding and how they can get projects done. She noted she has had a lot of comments from <br />residents regarding storage and more restroom facilities in the parks. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities SuperVisor Riverblood stated on slow agendas they could discuss a certain park <br />and what would fit in along with trails. He ~xplained they could look at the existing inventory <br />and identify what is not there at each park and what they would like to include in each park. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated she liked the idea of a step-by-step approach but would tike to get <br />started on a park plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sl'u'yock thought they could look at this by park or by park district to see if they <br />had everything they wanted in the area. She thought aerial views of the parks would be helpful <br />when discussing them. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman thought doing this by district would be heipt'ul and allow residents to <br />give their input about the parks in their district. <br /> <br />Pnge 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.