My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/02/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/02/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:34:37 AM
Creation date
11/29/2004 9:42:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/02/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
install a uniform fence along the entire block of homes at the time of development. She stated <br />she hopes staff will )ook a~ that some day., as it is nor becoming when every property has a <br />different type of fence. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained staff keeps a similar list for R-2 and <br />standards, and this wilt be added to those lists for discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmennan concurred with Councilmember Kurak. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired about the barbed wire requirements for a situation such as a 30-acre <br />parcel that has horses. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained this ordinance is proposing to eliminate the <br />barbed wire on a residential property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook commented barbed wire is not good fencing for horses. He stated he has a <br />concern about the three-fbot setback, as there will be problems with maintaining the area on the <br />other side of the fence. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated horses reach under the fence and eat the ~ass. He thinks the setback is <br />good so a person can get on both sides to maintain the fence without trespassing. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Stron-unen, to introduce an <br />ordinance to amend the R-1 Residential District regulations. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Pearson, Stro~rumen, Kurak, and <br />Zimmennan. Voting No: Councilmember Cook. Absent: Councilrnember Elvig. <br /> <br />Case #12: <br /> <br />Adopt Ordinance Authorizing the Sale of Lot t, Block I, Business Park 95 <br />Second Addition, Anoka CounB,, Minnesota <br /> <br />City Attorney G°odrfch indicated on October' 12, 2004, the Council introduced an ordinance to <br />authorize the sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Business Park 95 Second Addition. The ordinance is now <br />being presented for formal adoption. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if this is for the expansion for Zero Zone. <br /> <br />City Attorney G0odfich responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Zimmennan, to adopt Ordinance <br />No. 04-42 authorizing the sale of the Lot t, Block 1, Business Park 95 Second Addition, Anoka <br />County, Mirmesota. <br /> <br />roi1 call vote was perfo~Tned by the Recording Secretary: <br /> <br />P58 <br /> <br />CiD' Council/October 26, 2004 <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.