|
Len,.m 3rd _-\.2cut,on - Site PiamPond 8ui!din'~
<br />
<br />Floor Area Ratio: brace ti~e Pond B'~filding ~s proposed ~:o be bc~[ed on ~ut [ with several
<br />OLite, SU'UCRLrOS. ~iOC'L' area ratio will have
<br />....... B,_mc, t .... ~. Loc .i ~L zownCenter 2 Admuon ts proposed
<br />to accommcdate 5he ~rocerv store, the~ pump islands, and ~ other commerctai su'uctures. The
<br /> , . o .... ......~ The minimum floor ares ratio
<br />area ofLot ~ ts ~8,~.c ~q, ...... t~et. '
<br />
<br /> ...... ctUON, va~ Of Phase 1. d~e total floor area was o< ~sn Jquare
<br />.... ..... ronu Building has increased o7 i,200 square feet
<br />and the new tom~ mr Lot L vv_h be xO.os0 square test. This calcuiauon still [alls short of the .5
<br />floor area to lot size ratio: however, a variance to the floor area ratio was ~ran~ed as a pmx o6 the
<br />
<br /> [he ~.[~[..aetL Town Center Zoning District ass se~baca standards based on the
<br />?rmcio/e of"build to" Lines ra~her dmn traditional setbacks. This is especiail7 important fbr the
<br />~n, . it r,,,ica!!v wh .... ,he building presentation relationship {s to the ..... The
<br />~,~ t,, .i-. in the lC ~ m'., i-, ~ ..... ' '" e~ , . ' ~.~t. Side: 10 foot
<br />setback fi'om building to building, 0 foot se[back fi'om building to propetx7 line. Neat' 30 t~et.
<br />The Pond ~,,,.txk,~_-~'~o meets tl~e., stae. rear. and ounc4ng-to-buuamg >etoacKs. However, it does not
<br />.....~,..m,,~,"v with ~,c.- .... ma.,m.._~m; n,, Croat yard ~,.~.au~k .~. ~,~.n~;", S,.mwood Drive. A variance to the fi'ont, yard
<br />setback reauiremen[ ',,viii be submitted tc fi~ebum° ..... ,_, oC Adjustment ot~ December _', 2004.
<br />
<br />Grading and Drainage Pi:m: The site grading and drainage v/ere re,/iewed and commented on
<br />as part of the Phase ~ approval. The area outskie the mu[ti-tenant restaurant building should be
<br />shaded to ; ' q;-'- -4.., ~.. '
<br /> mu,c,te ,m, h is not pmx oCt[ds review package. The proposed drive up achess oa tlTis
<br /> ~ *~ cequu'e revlston of the Phase 1 site and grading plans.
<br />
<br />Rsvised plans tbr Phase i were issued November 12. 2004. The p[ans state that the retaining
<br />wails around the pond are not des~eneci tbr structural loads. The oundma plans for dfis building
<br />must be coordinated with the plans tbr Phase i retaining wails so :hat the btfilding footings will
<br />be adequately proected.
<br />
<br />L;tndscaping: ' .... :.,- ~.,,,:< .... ',o
<br /> aas oeen received since ~hmt approval o~ Phase
<br />deveiopment pians ~br Lot i. Fhe revised Landscape Plan is dated November ~'2, 2004. The
<br />revised p{an includes i48 ,a~,s ..... and 34a. sin'ubs, which meet and/or exceed the minimum
<br />recmirements of Cia, Cocie. ~'," ' c.
<br /> . ~ ~a J~e~m:te. ail of the species are considered acceptable or prefkn'ed
<br />as outlined in rise Ramsev ~t'ee SuoK. ail tree sizes also meet or excess the mMmum
<br />:'equiremcn[s d~c -'~',m,_,u"," six,ss :xe sot ::ndicated but. at a minimum, d2ev need :o be ehher cwo
<br />!~ct in' ;,,"w ' : - ....... "
<br />
<br />2O
<br />
<br />
<br />
|