Laserfiche WebLink
7. That the Applicant proposes to develop a multi-tenant restaurant facility with a drive-up <br /> window for the convenience of itineran~ cLtstome,"s. <br /> <br />8. That the proposed drive~,~lp window is located on the southern side of the building away from <br /> the main parking area for the Subject Property. <br /> <br />That the City has reviewed the use of the drive-d~'u and finds that the use of the drive-thru is <br />compatible with the intent ot~ the Ramsey Town Center development and the ~pe of <br />restaurant £acilitv being developed on the Subject Property. <br /> <br />! O. <br /> <br />That the City has reviewed tixe use of the drive-tln'u and finds that the use will/will not <br />provide ibr proper and safe traf±}c circulation. <br /> <br />11. That the proposed use will/will not adversely impact t,,'a£'~]c in the area. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or other,vise detrimental to persons <br />residin~ or working in the vicinity or'the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed use will/will not substantially adversely impair the use. enjoyment, or <br /> market value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed use Yvill/vviil not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or £uture <br /> neighboring uses. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not be served adequately by' public Facilities and setwices such <br />as highways and streets. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />publie L'acilities and services, and it will/will not be detrimental to the economic welfhre <br />the cotnmunity. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not involve actiyities and ktses that will be detrimental to any <br />persons, property, or the general welfare bv reason of excessive production of tra~t'~ic, noise, <br />smoke t'ttmes, glare or odors. <br /> <br />· The motion Ibr the adoption of the tbregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councih'nember <br /> , and upon :;ore being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the t'ollo,.vhl~ ,,,'<)ted ao_ainst the same: <br /> <br />trod ~.i~e tbilo,.vin< abstai~2ed: <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />