My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/02/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/02/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:34:37 AM
Creation date
11/29/2004 9:42:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/02/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pages ':-"~ ' ~'0.2004 <br /> <br />Z,B. <br /> <br />aiunx ,vim rem}va:ions and imorovemen:s :o axis:m: buildinzs and parhn: loss. <br />The vnlate utumate:v denied :he appiicafion, 4 ~ ~ and par~n~ concerns. <br /> - · · ~=,: in its favor. The lower <br /> The school sued :axe village. 'and the sour: rd~ <br /> <br /> ' ~oss:bt~lc¥ of a~ro,/ai of <br /> The '" ~ ,-~ ' : it had!eft open :he ' '~' ' <br />a modified elan and had no. in:~n:io~ of aenvm~ :h~ plan for :eh=sous reasons. <br />DE CIStOb': Reversed. <br /> The village's decision w~s no: definitive and was thus less [ike!y <br />standallv burden :he "~' ~ "~ o~ rsiigion. <br />~ead m its ~ : ~::~ fide village's :esoluuon seemed to imubz that the viilaze did <br />not ptx~ort ~o pronounce ~he end of she school's proposed r¢novadons in theft <br />entire~v, but radter ~o d~nv only :he application sub~tted. T~s left open the <br />aossibiii:v ~hat a modification of ~he proposal, coupled whh ~he sub~ssfon of <br />~atisfacto~v data found [~c!~ng fn ~he earher proceedings, ~,vouid result in approval. <br />For exnmp!e. ~he pemfltimace sentenc~ of zhe resolution stressed, 'XMs de,al <br />exclusiv&v addresses the future expansion of :he school and its accessou/uses <br />... as they re[ate ~o :his ~pplicam~n." These words s~emea :o expressly imply <br />' ,. · :~.=m . ~he possibility of asprovinz a new application. <br /> the village utc not ~ut~ose ~ ~ <br /> Furthermore. reasons specified for the demal supposed a possibiS~ of cure by <br /> mo&ficauon of non-reiimous (eamres of the plan. such as p~'14ng and craffPc flow, <br /> provision of further information, and the tarns of additional procedural steps. <br /> The lower court's decision that the denial was conclusive and definite <br /> neared ~o be based on its belief that the denial represented a substantial burden <br /> on the exercise of religion, Howewr, re~ection of a sub.trod pron. w~le leaving <br /> ouen she sossib[iicy of asprovai of a resubmfssion with modifications designed <br /> to address ~he shed ' ' ~ was [ess tik~lv to constitute a substantial burden <br /> o/ootems, <br /> than a definitive rejection of the same plan with no possibility of approval of a <br /> mo&fled proposal <br /> <br /> 349 <br /> <br /> Z~mitng:and?Emi~n.en~.D~m:~in:cbi~'e~en%- . '. :. :', .:..,,_ :: <br />' · ' '. ' 9 " 004 ':.n S .' :. :'/: '' <br /> Decemb.r - ~ · · · . .- . :.. <br /> <br /> Presented by the Ce~lter.~bt, A. meric:m' and.t'~:te'r:ia~o~t'at"~::~ .' <br /> (b:mi"e:'ence' De>:,X'i~dot¥. Yhis m'o~/am'::4li explore ~, nmjot: Ohan~e' od" .-' <br /> <br />· direct:on in manv xtate and federai, u:~,: u~e ceclstons'.. He. ad:imm:' the ::: <br />58881'OUS !Vli[ b~ this "~ '"" ":tAC[<~tlS[~F C~S~' 151 ~,. ~ - . <br />ct:ur: decided _: co~:den:~a[tor.~ cannD~ be t~ge~ ~o~1'i: ~:Or ~sc,1IOIl~ <br /> <br /> h,, ' ....~'-',~-:- will also be ~eam~ed. <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />~ 2C(}s :.:~nl.ar, C'!L;il.'-':',iq:: :-:6ui; -', 9Ci'r:,:lt!C::6i' : :ronlote,2. :.1: ::cra ' icrma[Iorl c',eas~. :a:i 6--' :42-0048 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.