My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/12/15 & 02/17/15 Strategy Session - 02/12/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/12/15 & 02/17/15 Strategy Session - 02/12/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:00:39 PM
Creation date
10/31/2017 1:00:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
02/12/15 & 02/17/15 Strategy Session
Document Date
02/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Page 3, Q12. 12. How effectively does staff support your commission's efforts? <br />1 Again- better communication with Commissions and more frequent attendance <br />of a Council member(s) at Commission meetings would be appreciated. <br />2 They do a good job in preparation <br />3 constrained by time and staffing levels <br />4 I can't think of anytime staff was unsupportive. There have been lack of time <br />issues, but I believe that had more to do with staff becoming over - burdened. No <br />complaints here. <br />5 our staff person could utilize us much more. He ttys to take on the workload too <br />much by him self. <br />1 There have been some really bad decisions in the past- and some decent ones. <br />We just need to be mindful when working with the publics money. <br />2 They do pretty well. Sometimes staff vs elected officials disagree. may that's ok <br />3 I believe too much has been made of spending money on consultants to look <br />back at previous mistakes. To much time and resources on learning and blaming <br />previous administrations. Take a rough look and move forward. For a City <br />thinking it is in hardship, spending money on consultants, new signage, <br />letterhead, etc. for, The COR ", was ridiculous. As well the electronic sign on <br />Highway 10 is distracting, hard to read (not big enough for me anyway) at <br />highway speeds. Moving meetings and resources around is abusing assets. The <br />City needs to be putting caps and penalties on any agreements, and escape <br />clauses when things are not going as planned and agreed upon. And then the <br />City actually needs to act when appropriate. The City (residents) should not be <br />on the hook when agreements are not kept. <br />4 I don't need the high blood pressure that studying this issue would bring. It <br />seems they are, but that can change instantly. <br />5 would like to see more investment in actual services rather than consulting fees. <br />6 We have struggled with the COR and I think a differnet management approach <br />would have seen more action in that area. <br />39 of 40 <br />Jan 23, 2013 1:48 PM <br />Jan 22, 2013 10:42 AM <br />Jan 18, 2013 11:04 AM <br />Jan 17, 2013 12:00 PM <br />Jan 15, 2013 11:42 AM <br />Page 3, Q13. 13. How effectively does the City manage its assets? <br />Jan 23, 2013 1:48 PM <br />Jan 22, 2013 10:42 AM <br />Jan 17, 2013 12:00 PM <br />Jan 16, 2013 11:17 AM <br />Jan 15, 2013 11:42 AM <br />Jan 14, 2013 3:54 PM <br />7 Little information Jan 14, 2013 3:44 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.