Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 4. <br />Meeting Date: 11/14/2017 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Policy for Naming Public Facilities <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: To discuss options for amending the City's public facilities naming policy. <br />Background: In 1991, City staff was requested to have the south portion of River's Bend Park renamed, and at that <br />time, it came to light that the City did not have a formal public facility naming policy. A policy was drafted and <br />presented to the Park and Recreation Commission for discussion and comment. The Park and Recreation <br />Commission approved that policy and recommended the City Council review same and adopt. On June 11, 1991, <br />the City Council adopted Resolution #91-06-138 formally adopting the Park and Recreation Commission's Public <br />Facility Naming Policy. That Resolution/Policy is attached for Council information. The resolution states "that all <br />proposed public facility names shall first go before the Park and Recreation Commission. In the case of parklands, <br />the name shall be chosen before final plat approval and will generally reflect the name of the subdivision or other <br />significant geographical feature. Any sign bearing the name of a public facility will be in accordance with City <br />Code requirements for signs, and facility names other than those of the subdivision that contains them will be <br />brought before the City Council for approval". <br />In 2009, a case went before the Park and Recreation Commission to discuss a policy for accepting park donations, <br />monuments, memorials, and other improvements. The Commission sent such policy for adoption to the City <br />Council. Resolution #09-04-075 formally adopted the policy for accepting park donations, monuments, memorials <br />and other improvements and that action was taken by the City Council on April 14, 2009. The resolution/policy <br />referenced donations with regard to naming rights. That resolution is also attached for Council information. It states <br />the following: "If a financial contribution exceeding 60% of the cost of major planned improvements is made, <br />naming rights for new parks and recreational facilities may be granted through City Council approval". Attached as <br />additional information relating to the research in drafting that policy is a summary of memorial policies adopted by <br />other cities. <br />In 2014, the Park and Recreation Commission (P&R) again looked at the policy for naming public facilities. The <br />Elmcrest Park facility was nearing completion and a suggestion had been made that it could be dedicated in some <br />manner, or have some element of it dedicated to former leadership of the Northern Lights Soccer Program. The <br />P&R Commission reviewed a couple of policies of other municipalities, including one from the City of Champlin. <br />That policy is attached to this case for Council information. Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Mark <br />Riverblood presented the case to the Commission and asked for input on other sample policies he presented. <br />Consensus of the Commission was to direct staff to develop a naming rights policy using the policy from the City <br />of Champlin as a starting point, but using an application process rather than a petition process; to include a <br />threshold for donations of more than half or 60 percent; language specifying that the request would go before the <br />City Council but that approval is not guaranteed. A draft document was not completed nor brought to Council. <br />At a Park and Recreation Commission meeting in November 2016, the 2017 - 2026 Parks Five -Year Capital <br />Improvements Plan was discussed. A question was raised about the Elmcrest and Draw entrance signage and <br />whether there had been a discussion about honoring veterans or others. Mr. Riverblood stated that the public <br />naming policy would be followed. The naming would be reviewed with the City Council and any ideas from the <br />Commissioners could be explored. It appears this subject has not been discussed again since then and that the <br />reference to the policy would have been the one adopted by Resolution #91-06-138. <br />