Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #3 <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />OF PLATTING PROCEDURES RELATING TO FLINTWOOD <br /> HILLS 2ND ADDITION P.U.D. <br /> By: City Engineer Steven Jankowski <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Recently I (Sylvia Frolik) was approached by Art Raudio with a request to plat Outlots M and N of <br />Flintwood Hills 2nd Addition P.U.D. In accordance with our Subdivision Ordnance I informed <br />Mr. Raudio that the procedure to platting unplatted land is to submit a subdivision application to the <br />City along with the required escrow deposit. The proposed subdivision is then processed through <br />sketch plan, preliminary plat including public hearing and final plat approval. Mr. Raudio <br />contended that the proposed subdivision of Outlots M and N received preliminary plat approval in <br />1984 under Flintwood Hills 2nd Addition P.U.D. and therefore should proceed right to the final <br />plat stage. I confirmed that the subdivision plan for Outlots M and N did receive preliminary plat <br />approval but when the developers recorded the 2nd Addition, it did not show M and N being <br />subdivided, but rather designated that particular area as an outlot. Therefore, I concluded that it <br />was unplatted land that should follow subdivision procedures from the point of application. Mr. <br />Raudio asked that I research the Flintwood Hills 2nd Addition case file further. I found that the <br />final plat approval of Flintwood Hills 2nd Addition P.U.D. encompassed the total area and <br />indicated that the P.U.D. would be a 2-phased development. However, when the developers <br />recorded the final plat it only included an area they intended to develop immediately and the <br />remainder of the area was designated as outlots. Subsequently, future phases of 2nd Addition <br />P.U.D. were platted and developed as Flintwood Hills 3rd and 4th Additions and those plats <br />received final plat approval based on the preliminary plat approval granted in 1984. <br /> <br />All of this led to myself and Steve Jankowski researching whether or not the proper procedure had <br />been followed in the past as Flintwood Hills 3rd and 4th were phases of of Flintwood Hills 2nd <br />Addition, but final plat approval to 3rd and 4th was granted years after preliminary plat approval. <br />City Ordinance in effect at the time the Flintwood Hills P.U.D. was platted states that the developer <br />must file for final plat approval within 6 months of the preliminary plat approval. The text that <br />follows summarizes the research of subdivision ordinances. <br /> <br />Wording of Subdivision Ordinance Regarding Procedure. <br /> <br />A major element of uncertainty stems from the fact that the wording of the subdivision ordinances <br />states that final plat approval must be preceded by preliminary plat approval. Preliminary plat <br />approval on the plat in question had been obtained over six years ago. Until Fall of 1990, the City <br />Ordinance required the final plat to be filed within six months of preliminary plat approval. The <br />wording of the ordinance was amended to extend the recording period to one year. However, a <br />strict literal interpretation of either of these ordinances leaves doubt as to what the appropriate <br />procedure is in this particular situation. For example, the original ordinance read as follows: <br /> <br />Within six months following approval of the preliminary plat, unless an extension of time is requested in <br />writing by the subdivider and granted by the City Council, the subdivider shall file six copies of the final <br />plat, together with any necessary supplementary information, with the Zoning Officer. The final plat shall <br />incorporate all changes required by the City Council. If a final plat covering all or a portion of the <br />preliminary plat is not filed within six months following approval of the preliminary plat, the approval of <br />the preliminary plat shall be considered void. <br /> <br />Would this mean if a portion of a preliminary plat is final platted (as was the case with Flintwood <br />Hills 2nd Addition) then is the remainder of preliminary plat valid forever? Similarly, the new <br />wording also is somewhat ambiguous in this case: <br /> <br />Following approval of the preliminary plat by the Council, the Zoning Officer shall promptly notify the <br />subdivider of said approval and furnish him with a certified copy of the resolution approving preliminary <br /> <br /> <br />