Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # I <br /> <br />DISCUSS PROPOSED ORDINANCES TO AMEND REGULATIONS FOR <br />ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, ACCESSORY USES AND DEFINITIONS <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At your April meeting, we reviewed the proposed changes to Section 9.02 (Definitions) and <br />9.11.02 (Accessory Uses). Per that discussion, Staff has made the appropriate changes to the <br />proposed ordinance and scheduled a public hearing accordingly. The most recent draft of the <br />proposed ordinance is enclosed for your review. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />In summary, the proposed changes to this section of the City Code are as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />The definition of 'accessory building' was amended to clarify that attached garages are <br />considered accessory buildings and that the primary accessory building would be the <br />attached garage or in the absence thereof, the initial detached garage constructed on a <br />property. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />The definition for 'lot, minimum area of' was amended to eliminate the ability to include <br />road right-of-way when determining lot areas in the rural district. Language was added to <br />prohibit the showing for sale of more than one vehicle on property not zoned for motor <br />vehicle sales. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />S) <br /> <br />As a side issue, Staff is requeting that a definition for 'Personal Services' be added to City <br />Code. Some of our zoning districts list 'Personal Services' as a permitted use. Code <br />currently does not have a definition for 'Personal Services'. <br /> <br />The ability to maintain one unlicensed vehicle on a property was retained. <br /> <br />Upon the recommendation of the Building Official, Subdivision 3 of 9.11.02 was amended <br />so that the location of accessory buildings so as not to prohibit orderly resubdivision of the <br />property becomes the responsibility of the property owner rather than the Building Official. <br /> <br />6) <br /> <br />It was clarified that the maximum accessory building height regulations apply to detached <br />accessory buildings. <br /> <br />7) <br /> <br />For aCCuracy purposes, references to lot sizes were converted from in terms of acres to in <br />terms of square feet. <br /> <br />8) <br /> <br />The 10t size threshold for having metal accessory buildings was reduced from 2.5 acres to <br />approximately 2.29 acres, or 100,001 square feet as it is now referred to. <br /> <br />9) <br /> <br />A performance standard was added to require that any metal building constructed within 75 <br />feet of a property line would be designed with soffit, facia and eave overhang. <br /> <br />10) <br /> <br />A performance standard was added to require that the initial garage constructed on a <br />property served by city sewer and water must be attached to the dwelling. <br /> <br /> <br />