Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> i <br />'! <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />4) <br />$) <br /> <br />7) <br /> <br />8) <br />9) <br /> <br />10) <br />11) <br /> <br />Letter from Dom and Edwards dated 8/5/92 to Sylvia Frolik . <br />Letter from Sylvia Frolik to Wilbur Dom dated 9/21/92 <br />Letter from Dom and Edwards to. City Attorney William Goodrich dated 1/26/93 <br />l~xample of letter from Dom and Edwards to surrounding property owners dated <br />2/17/93 <br />Letter from Ronald Jcrich to Planning Commission dated February 20, 1993. <br />Letter from SteVen Schwanke, Metropolitan Council, to Ryan Schroedcr, City <br />Administrator, dated March 30,'1993 <br />Planning and Zoning Commission case cover sheet dated April 6, 1993 <br />Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated April 6, 1993 <br /> <br />0 bservations: <br /> <br />Mr. Wilbur Dom has requested an audience with the Planning and Zoning Commission tO respond <br />to each of the contingencies identified in the recommendation for approval. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />It is City Staff'siopinion that the sketch plan approval contingencies are still appropriate. Taking <br />into consideration the comments made-in the Metro COuncil letter of March 30, 1993, the City is <br />concerned that ibremature development of mutli-family units in the rural district will negatively <br />impact Metro Council's review of current and future MUSA expansion ~equests. The townhouse <br />project should nbt go forward without written approval from Metro Council. <br /> <br />CommiSsion Action: <br /> <br />Will be based on your discussion. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />PZ: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />12/7/93 <br /> <br /> <br />