My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/1994
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 4:11:42 PM
Creation date
11/13/2017 11:31:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/01/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF TOWNHOUSES OF RUM <br />RIVER HILLS; CASE OF WILBUR DORN AND THOMAS ANDERSON <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Wilbur Dorn and Thomas Anderson are requesting preliminary plat approval of "Townhouses of <br />Rum River Hills" which is proposed to replat Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot C, Rum River Hills, into <br />12 townhouse lots. The 12 units would be served by individual on-site septic systems and wells. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />On April 6, 1993, the Planning Commission reviewed a sketch plan for Townhouses of Rum <br />River Hills. At that time, City Staff expressed concern with the proposal because it conflicted with <br />the Comprehensive Plan, the development regulations in the Rural Transition District, and its <br />precedent setting nature. The Planning Commission recommended that City Council grant sketch <br />plan approval contingent upon the developer accomplishing a number of items that would alleviate <br />staff's concern with the proposal to develop higher density units without city sewer and water. <br /> <br />On December 7, 1993, the developer approached the Planning Commission and reported that he <br />could comply with all of the contingencies for sketch plan approval with one exception. Mr. Dom <br />stated that it would be impossible to get a written favorable review from Metro Council. The <br />Planning Commission recommended that City Council grant sketch plan approval to Townhouses <br />of Rum River Hills absent of any favorable reviews from Metyo Council. <br /> <br />At the applicant's request, the sketch plan was not forwarded to City Council until March of 1994. <br /> <br />On March 8, 1994, the City Council tabled the request for sketch plan approval and directed City <br />Staff to develop criteria to be used in reviewing proposals that deviate from the 4 in 40 density role <br />and the comprehensive plan for extension of public utilities. <br /> <br />On April 26, 1994, the City Council entered into an addendum to the Development Agreement for <br />Rum River Hills wherein the City affirmed its commitment to develop criteria that would permit <br />luther consideration of Townhouses of Rum River Hills. <br /> <br />On August 2 and August 9, respectively, City Staff presented the ex-urban review criteria to the <br />Planning Commission and City Council. Both entities felt that the resolution was nebulous'and a <br />rewrite was necessary. <br /> <br />On September 1, 1994, a memo was issued to City Council wherein City Staff advised that it <br />would be in the City's best interest to deal with proposals that deviate from the 4 in 40 density rule <br />and the comprehensive plan on a case by case basis rather than attempting to follow criteria that <br />cannot take into account every kind of scenario that might be presented to the City. <br /> <br />On September 12, 1994, City Council approved the sketch plan for Townhouses of Rum River <br />Hills and directed the developer to apply for preliminary plat approval. <br /> <br />In October, 1994, the City received the proposed preliminary plat and a public hearing was <br />scheduled in front of the Planning Commission for November 1, 1994. <br />The following items are enclosed for your review and information: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.