My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/06/1994
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/06/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 4:11:49 PM
Creation date
11/13/2017 11:31:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/06/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning requirements for accessory apartments should reassure opponents, and at the same time it <br />is important not to overwhelm homeowners with hurdles like public hearings. Many people, <br />particularly the elderly, will not consider going through a public hearing. A provision could be <br />included in an ordinance for accessory apartments that exempts the homeowner from normal <br />procedures such as a public hearing unless requested by the immediate neighbors. The concerns <br />for traffic and off-street parking can be alleviated by prohibiting on-street parking. The criteria for <br />an accessory apartment should also prohibit the conversion of garage space to additional living <br />space without replacing the garage. <br /> <br />It is unlikely that an accessory apartment ordinance will make property values decline. There are <br />few available facts on this subject, other than the lack of significant change in property values <br />reported in cities that have ordinances. The market effects of an accessory apartment ordinance <br />will be more than masked by other influences on home prices such as interest rates. <br /> <br />Communities may be presented with accessory apartments in their neighborhood whether or not <br />there is an ordinance. The lack of regulations appears to work to the advantage of the homeowner. <br />The homeowner avoids bureaucracy and increased property taxes and probably converts more <br />cheaply. This general attitude results in the continued spread of illegal accessory apartments. The <br />growth of poor quality conversions may become a problem for the city because of code violations. <br />Reports show that other cities that have legalized accessory apartments after they had spread to 10- <br />20 percent of their housing stock had to devise ways to encourage people to bring their apartments <br />up to code. The presence of an ordinance permitting accessory apartments doesn't necessarily <br />stimulate conversion to accessory apartments, and the absence of one doesn't necessarily <br />discourage them. <br /> <br />Accessory apartments are not likely to increase the number of people living in a house beyond the <br />number for which it was originally designed. As a result, there should not generally be a problem <br />in the rural district from the increased burden on water and sewer services. Staff would suggest <br />that the best policy is to clearly state in the accessory apartment permit that the homeowner accepts <br />all responsibility for the well and septic and indemnifies the City against any liability as a result of <br />the issuance of the permit. <br /> <br />To insure that accessory apartments will not visually destroy the single family character of the <br />neighborhood, the most common provision put in permits is that there shall be no creation of <br />additional entrances on the front of the house. To prevent speculation and to insure that the <br />appearance of the structure will be maintained, a very common requirement in accessory apartment <br />permits is that the owner of the home continue to reside in one of the units and must have resided <br />in the home for a specified amount of time previous to the application. <br /> <br />Many apartment ordinances attempt to specify maximum and minimum apartment sizes to ensure <br />that the accessory apartment will be subordinate to the principal structure. One approach is to set a <br />minimum number of square feet that applies to both units or to set a maximum percentage of the <br />principal structure that will be consumed by the accessory apartment. Many times there is a <br />maximum placed on the number of bedrooms allowed in the rental unit. However, it may take a <br />combination of several of these approaches to give the flexibility necessary to deal equitably with <br />the variety of house types in which accessory apartments may be installed. For example, a <br />colonial-style home with equal floor areas upstairs and down may be difficult to convert into <br />anything other than two units that are roughly equal in floor area. Staff would recommend the <br />simple approach of deferring maximum and minimum apartment sizes in accordance with <br />applicable regulations in the health, housing and building codes. <br /> <br />It is important to understand that zoning for accessory apartments may not produce many accessory <br />units. Installing an accessory apartment requires permit approval, remodeling, making design <br />decisions, setting a rent level, deciding upon and finding financing, managing tenants and <br />addressing tax implications. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.