Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember LeTourneau, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to waive the City <br /> Charter requirement to read the ordinance aloud and adopt Zoning Amendment Ordinance #17- <br /> 10 Amending Section 117-90 "Map" of Chapter 117 of the City Code of Ramsey, Minnesota. <br /> Further discussion: Councilmember Johns stated that there are certain elements required for a <br /> PUD, including a 20 percent requirement for public open space, and asked if the buffer would <br /> help to establish that 20 percent. City Planner Anderson replied and confirmed that the buffer <br /> and corridor together would address the 20 percent requirement. <br /> A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: <br /> Councilmember Riley aye <br /> Councilmember Shryock aye <br /> Councilmember LeTourneau aye <br /> Councilmember Johns aye <br /> Councilmember Kuzma aye <br /> Mayor Strommen aye <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Motion by Councilmember LeTourneau, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to Adopt <br /> Resolution #17-10-269 Granting Approval of the Final Plat and Development Agreement for <br /> Pearson Place. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers LeTourneau, Johns, Kuzma, <br /> Riley, and Shryock. Voting No: None. <br /> 7.09: Preliminary Approvals Related to Proposed North Fork Meadows Subdivision; <br /> Case of Paxmar, LLC (Project No. 17-126) <br /> 1. Introduce Ordinance#17-16 Approving a Conditional Zoning Amendment to <br /> Planned Unit Development <br /> 2. Adopt Resolution #17-10-276 Authorizing Conditional Rezoning Agreement <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report. He noted that Planning <br /> Commissioner Surma actually voted in support of the action and wanted to clarify that as the <br /> record did not reflect that action. He noted that when considering a recommendation, staff <br /> reviewed the concept again and the points raised during the first stages of review: consistency <br /> with the Comprehensive Plan; the need for a more compelling reason to amend the <br /> Comprehensive Plan, or leave as Low Density Residential (LDR); and the desire to create a more <br /> meaningful Density Transitioning Plan (DTP), with wider lots and deeper lots. He stated that <br /> considering those factors, staff feels that this is a reasonable compromise and would support the <br /> Planning Commission and City Council in approving this project. He noted that as a reminder, <br /> the City is not obligated to approve the project and this is a policy level decision that requires <br /> direction from the City Council. <br /> Councilmember Kuzma asked the potential consequences could result from this action. <br /> City Council/October 24, 2017 <br /> Page 10 of 16 <br />