My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 12/08/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2004
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 12/08/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 1:37:36 PM
Creation date
12/1/2004 9:09:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
12/08/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Kiefer noted he had requested a discussion with Bruce Bacon be placed on a future <br />agenda during the October 13th meeting. Associate Planner Wald replied she contacted Mr. <br />Bacon to inform him of the request and it will likely be on the agenda of the January or February <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Acting Chairperson Steffen, Members Gromberg, Kiefer, and <br />Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Riley, Members Kurak and LeTourneau. <br /> <br />EDA BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Development Signs <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald reviewed with the EDA that at the October 13, 2004 EDA meeting, the <br />authority directed staff to solicit input from EDAM members related to language ideas for <br />economic development signs. Staffsent a mass email to all EDAM members asking if anyone <br />has utilized signs that promote City initiated economic development projects. Staff received <br />several emails stating that such a sign would be a great idea but nobody had an existing <br />economic development sign. Several cities utilize land use or zoning signs to signify a land use <br />application has been submitted to the City. She reviewed a flyer received in the mail, and an <br />email with suggestions received from Mike Mulrooney. Staff recommends that the EDA make a <br />determination on appropriate language to be contained on the signs and direct staff to begin <br />working with TJ & Associates. It is important to establish language that reflects the intent and <br />purpose the signs are intended to serve. <br /> <br />The consensus of the EDA was that the signs should include the following language: <br /> <br />Community Revitalization at Work <br />City of Ramsey <br />Economic Development Authority <br /> <br />Case #2: Monument Signs <br /> <br />Economic Development/TIF Specialist Sullivan reviewed with the EDA that staff presented sign <br />types to the EDA on September 8, 2004 and the EDA identified three types of signs that they <br />preferred. Staff was directed to research the cost involved with the preferred signs and to present <br />the information to the EDA. The Brock White Company of Elk River constructed the signs <br />selected by the EDA, and all quotes are provided from that business. It has been discussed that it <br />may be beneficial to light the signs. He presented the EDA with samples of Indiana Limestone <br />and Kasota Limestone for their review. He indicated the signs range in price from $9,430 to <br />$12,765. Staff would like direction on the verbiage for the signs, as well as to proceed. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Steffen asked how many signs there would be. Economic Development/TIF <br />Specialist Sullivan replied there could be four signs focusing on the entry points to the industrial <br />parks. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/November 10, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.