Laserfiche WebLink
of the Connexus Energy campus for the proposed solar installation. <br />The EDA reviewed this case at their September 14, 2017 meeting (minutes attached). Note that their review was <br />specific to the potential use of the outlot owned by Connexus Energy that is part of Connexus' corporate campus. <br />The outlot is essentially rectangular in shape and is approximately 17.5 acres in size. The EDA unanimously <br />supported reserving this land for future economic growth opportunities (commercial/industrial development) rather <br />than for the solar farm being considered. The EDA did not provide any input or feedback on the Anoka <br />County -owned site that is currently being considered for the solar farm. Their motion specifically recommended to <br />City Council that the existing Connexus Energy outlot be reserved for future commercial/industrial use rather than <br />for a solar farm. <br />This request was reviewed again by the Planning Commission at their October 12, 2017 meeting. While there was <br />not a second Public Hearing, the Planning Commission did allow comments from the public. Both sets of minutes <br />from the September and October Planning Commission meetings are attached to this case. In general terms, the <br />following comments, concerns, and/or questions have been raised through the review process thus far: <br />• Aesthetics <br />• Impact to property values <br />• Financial surety to ensure equipment is removed <br />• Landscape buffer <br />• Will this deter future development <br />• Is this the best location for this use <br />• Timing of approval <br />The City Council approved the Conditional Use Permit on November 14, 2017, contingent upon adoption of <br />Ordinances #17-13 (Zoning Map Amendment) and #17-14 (Zoning Text Amendment). Both Ordinances were <br />introduced by the City Council on November 14, 2017 and are now eligible for adoption. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within a 350 foot radius of the Subject Property of the Public Hearing <br />held in September via Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also published in the City's official newsletter, <br />the Anoka County Union Herald. Staff also attempted to notify all Property Owners within a 350 foot radius of the <br />Subject Property that this item was scheduled to be considered by the City Council on November 14, 2017. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />As noted, the Subject Property is owned by Anoka County and was initially acquired to accommodate a future <br />bridge crossing. In 2007, the Subject Property was designated with an Official Map to prevent future development <br />from occurring in advance of the bridge crossing. However, the current Highway 10 Access Planning Study no <br />longer identifies this parcel as needed for a potential bridge crossing (with the new Armstrong Blvd overpass <br />alignment). The Planning Commission has assumed the duties of the Official Map Board of Appeals and <br />Adjustments and therefore, and has already taken action on an appeal to issue any type of development permit on <br />the Subject Property per City Code Section 117-4 (Official Map). <br />As part of the Official Map process in 2007, it was noted that the Subject Property was zoned R-2 Residential and <br />that the intention was to re -guide the parcel as Public/Quasi-Public with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update and <br />then subsequently rezone the parcel to Public/Quasi Public. That action did not occur. However, based on the <br />current owner of the Subject Property (Anoka County) and the proposed use (solar farm), it seems reasonable to <br />rezone the property as Public/Quasi-Public (this would also complete the stated intent when the area was officially <br />mapped) and to amend the uses of that zoning district to identify Solar Energy Systems as a principal use with the <br />issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (this district already identifies municipal and private substations as a <br />permitted use). <br />The Environmental Policy Board (EPB) was introduced to this concept at their July meeting and then officially <br />reviewed this request at their August meeting. Questions that the EPB had asked are outlined below along with the <br />responses from the solar developer and/or Connexus Energy. <br />