Laserfiche WebLink
He stated that he is not against renewable energy but if this does not work, Connexus will move to <br />another area outside the City. He stated that while publicity is great, protecting the environment <br />is better. He asked the Council to go back to the beginning to collect all the necessary information. <br />He stated that this will affect his business. He stated that plans change, and this will be a 25-year <br />commitment. <br />Jeff Angra, 8390 Highway 10, Shorewood RV, stated that his concern is on the environmental <br />impact. He stated that there is no method as to how this product is disposed of when the 25-year <br />period expires. He asked if money would be put into a bond to ensure that the City would not be <br />left with the clean-up costs. <br />Dave Nathe, 14453 Llama Street, stated that he owns the 174 acres of land that was originally <br />purchased by Anoka County for the bridge site. He asked that the Council leave the zoning the <br />same as that will help the adjacent land owners develop their land in the future. <br />John Dobbs, Woodbury resident, stated that he helps the Pearsons with some real estate planning. <br />He stated that this is the last large undeveloped track of land guided for sewer and water. He stated <br />that the 40 acres that Anoka County owns is the key to the land in the west and south. He stated <br />that generally when you split a 40-acre tract of land and take half of that out of play for 25 years, <br />it makes it challenging to develop the remnant parcel. <br />Mr. Burandt provided information on the disposal of the solar panels, noting that they are classified <br />as e-waste. He referenced the large solar farm in North Branch noting that there have not been <br />any negative impacts to property values because of that project. He stated that there have also <br />been no negative property values near the Ramsey Connexus site. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill took credit for the confusion on the vote at the <br />Planning Commission. He stated that the Planning Commission is supportive of the project, <br />although they potentially would have liked a different location. He recognized that the plans for <br />infrastructure in this area have changed and may continue to change. He stated that as he looks at <br />what is allowed, the surrounding area would still be developable. He stated that trunk fees would <br />be used to finance the extension of the sewer and water services. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that this parcel is the plan that Connexus has decided on and <br />confirmed that the Connexus owned site has been ruled out as a possibility. <br />Mr. Angra asked why staff cannot provide an estimate of the impact to property values, similar to <br />what is done with street projects. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that staff could follow up with Anoka County, <br />that completes the assessing. He noted that there are other projects that have not had negative <br />impacts on property values. <br />Mr. Angra asked the vote from the Planning Commission. <br />