My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/28/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 11/28/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:39:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 8:47:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/28/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Is the proposed Lake Itasca Greenwav lust a way to accommodate greater densities by justifying a <br />Planned Unit Development.? <br />No. This trail route along the linear wetland has been identified for decades as part of the Master Park <br />and Trail Plan, which is included within the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. <br />Accepting the land from the Developer for the proposed trail makes sense, but the wetland, isn't it <br />already protected from development? <br />Wetlands have certain protections from filling, but through permitting may be impacted or replaced <br />elsewhere. If the City were to acquire the wetland, the ecosystem is assured to remain intact and <br />contiguous. Further, if in the public domain, the City with other conservation partners, can enhance <br />the functioning and diversity of the wetland's plant community which would benefit pollinators and <br />many other organisms. <br />Can't the City just wait for development north of Bunker Lake Boulevard, and obtain the desired <br />Lake Itasca Greenwav at that time? <br />Park Dedication has already been satisfied for the area between Bunker Lake Boulevard and the <br />wetland area for a certain zoning and land use. If future development is the same as this zoning <br />designation, or the land use is of lessor intensity, the greenway could not be taken through the Park <br />Dedication process of the subdivision of land. <br />Further, Park Dedication is only 'triggered' when land is subdivided — if the land is sold and built on <br />without subdividing, the City cannot require certain development fees nor land dedication. <br />Another aspect of 'holding -out' for a possible greenway acquisition through the Park Dedication <br />process, is that the land north of Bunker Lake Boulevard may be developed in increments, and not all <br />future owners may be willing to concede to land dedication, versus a cash payment to satisfy Park <br />Dedication (if any would be due). <br />Lastly, there is no known subdivision plans at this time for the area north of Bunker Lake Blvd. The <br />area could remain in its existing conditions without the ability for the City to begin constructing the <br />trail element of the Lake Itasca Greenway for years, conceivably a decade or more. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.