Laserfiche WebLink
lately. He explained that the property to be acquired is not on the parcel being proposed for <br />development. It is on a parcel for a future business park. This site was originally planned for <br />Legacy Christian Academy. The approval process and infrastructure proceeded, and then the <br />Academy ultimately decided to stay in their existing Andover location. <br />Mr. Gladhill continued that as such, with that transaction, there was a degree of park dedication <br />that was contributed with this, and there were 4 acres of property in this general area. The idea <br />was to use it for park purposes or sell it on the private market, with the cash proceeds going into <br />the park dedication fund. A good portion of the park dedication has been satisfied. It is not likely <br />that the City can require through normal park dedication requirements this same degree of corridor <br />preservation and planning as possible through the PUD. The Planning Commission does <br />recommend proceeding with this PUD. He noted that there are members of the public present at <br />this meeting tonight. <br />Chair Bennett opened up discussion for the Commission. <br />Commissioner Sis asked about the 4 acres related to the Legacy Christian Academy proposal that <br />ultimately did not come to pass. <br />Mr. Riverblood noted the location of the 4 acres is on the SE quadrant of Puma and Alpine Drive. <br />He noted there was uncertainty about the development of this area, which may push back the <br />Greenway. He reinforced staff undertook a lengthy process relative to park programming and park <br />solutions that residents wanted. A mailing went out to 1,500 to 1,800 residents. Almost <br />universally, people embraced the idea of the Lake Itasca Greenway and the Lake Itasca <br />Community Park. This Commission recommended and the Council approved purchase of that <br />land. Mr. Riverblood concluded that it is staff's recommendation that the Greenway fulfill this <br />long-term endeavor by virtue of calling it that public benefit such that a PUD is acceptable to the <br />City. <br />Chair Bennett concurred that the Greenway is a significant public benefit and will be an amazing <br />amenity both for the subdivision and to the community as a whole. Cash contribution is the way <br />to go on this project. <br />Chair Bennett invited audience participation from anyone desiring to speak. <br />Mr. Riverblood apologized staff did not put together a couple sample motions. He stated it sounds <br />like the Commission is supportive of the PUD. He suggested, therefore, a motion to recommend <br />that City Council approve the plat as presently shown with park dedication and trail fees being <br />satisfied as a cash contribution, predicated upon being a Planned Unit Development. <br />Motion by Commissioner Sis, seconded by Commissioner Tchuinkwa, to recommend that City <br />Council approve the plat as presently shown with park dedication and trail fees being satisfied as <br />a cash contribution, predicated upon being a Planned Unit Development. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Bennett, Commissioners Sis, and Tchuinkwa, Bayer, and <br />Leistico. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Trappen. <br />Park and Recreation Commission Minutes Excerpt <br />November 09, 2017 <br />