Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember LeTourneau, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to waive the City <br />Charter requirement to read the ordinance aloud and adopt Zoning Amendment Ordinance #17- <br />10 Amending Section 117-90 "Map" of Chapter 117 of the City Code of Ramsey, Minnesota. <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Johns stated that there are certain elements required for a <br />PUD, including a 20 percent requirement for public open space, and asked if the buffer would <br />help to establish that 20 percent. City Planner Anderson replied and confirmed that the buffer <br />and corridor together would address the 20 percent requirement. <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: <br />Councilmember Riley aye <br />Councilmember Shryock aye <br />Councilmember LeTourneau aye <br />Councilmember Johns aye <br />Councilmember Kuzma aye <br />Mayor Strommen aye <br />Motion carried. <br />Motion by Councilmember LeTourneau, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to Adopt <br />Resolution #17-10-269 Granting Approval of the Final Plat and Development Agreement for <br />Pearson Place. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers LeTourneau, Johns, Kuzma, <br />Riley, and Shryock. Voting No: None. <br />7.09: Preliminary Approvals Related to Proposed North Fork Meadows Subdivision; <br />Case of Paxmar, LLC (Project No. 17-126) <br />1. Introduce Ordinance #17-16 Approving a Conditional Zoning Amendment to <br />Planned Unit Development <br />2. Adopt Resolution #17-10-276 Authorizing Conditional Rezoning Agreement <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report. He noted that Planning <br />Commissioner Surma actually voted in support of the action and wanted to clarify that as the <br />record did not reflect that action. He noted that when considering a recommendation, staff <br />reviewed the concept again and the points raised during the first stages of review: consistency <br />with the Comprehensive Plan; the need for a more compelling reason to amend the <br />Comprehensive Plan, or leave as Low Density Residential (LDR); and the desire to create a more <br />meaningful Density Transitioning Plan (DTP), with wider lots and deeper lots. He stated that <br />considering those factors, staff feels that this is a reasonable compromise and would support the <br />Planning Commission and City Council in approving this project. He noted that as a reminder, <br />the City is not obligated to approve the project and this is a policy level decision that requires <br />direction from the City Council. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked the potential consequences could result from this action. <br />City Council / October 24, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />