Laserfiche WebLink
and approval by the Schmitz's attorney. <br />• The City would be responsible for the legal fees in drafting the necessary easement for the construction. <br />• The project must be complete by December 31, 2017, otherwise the Schmitz's obligation is reduced by <br />$1,000 for each month thereafter that the project is under construction. <br />• The Schmitz's are entitled to see the winning contractor's bid <br />• If the total bid cost is less than the estimated $32,200, the Schmitz's total obligation will be reduced to 25% <br />of the lower bid. <br />Staff is not fully supportive of all these conditions, but is hopeful a settlement can be reached. Therefore, the <br />recommendation to Council is to authorize staff to enter into a settlement agreement with the Schmitz's, that, in <br />consideration of an $8,050, the City will proceed with the project, retain any necessary easements upon the <br />Schmitz's property, and negotiate a reasonable time for completion, subject to the review and approval of the City <br />Attorney. <br />To ensure the project can be completed by December 31, 2017, Hakanson Anderson revised the final plans by <br />moving the cul-de-sac 25-feet south to avoid impacts to an existing power pole. Having to remove the power pole <br />could delay construction for months and increase construction costs by $2,500 or more. <br />Staff solicited quotes based on the revised plans, but no quotes were received by the submittal deadline of noon <br />Thursday, October 5, 2017. On October 12, 2017, Staff requested quotes from four local contractors based on the <br />same plans but with extended due dates for quote submittals and substantial completion of construction. On October <br />16, Staff received one quote from Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $34,877. <br />Other project costs include Hakanson Anderson's fees for preparation of final plans and specifications ($3,800) and <br />construction staking ($1,000), the City's cost to supply the aggregate surfacing ($2,400), and easement <br />acquisition/recording fees ($3,500). <br />Therefore, total project costs are estimated to be around $45,600. <br />Staff contacted the other property owners on the north end of Potassium Street to discuss the identified easements <br />on their properties as needed to construct the improvements. The property owners south of the Schmitz's are <br />unwilling to grant an easement on their property, even if compensated for it. Easements on this property are not <br />absolutely necessary to construct the temporary cul-de-sac improvements since the drainage swale east of <br />Potassium Street can be omitted at this time. <br />The other property owner west of Potassium Street, Shadetree Communities, initially said they would only be <br />willing to provide temporary easements for up to 18 months. But upon further discussions, Shadetree indicated they <br />may be willing to provide the needed roadway easement, along with financial compensation, and a provision that <br />the easement would be vacated at the time the property is re -platted to allow Potassium Street to be connected to <br />Radium Street to the north, or to some other public street. <br />At the time this case was published, Staff was still waiting for a formal response from Shadetree Communities <br />regarding Staff's proposed easement language, which is included in the attached easement figure for parcel <br />23-32-25-21-0002. This is the same figure that was provided to Shadetree for their review and comment. If <br />Shadetree is not willing to grant the required easements, the project cannot be constructed as proposed. <br />The quote received from Dave Perkins Contracting is valid through November 8, 2017. After this date, Staff would <br />need to reach out to see if they are still willing to honor their quote. <br />Notification: <br />Notifications were not required for this case. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />