My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:38:57 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 9:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/24/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
713
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer will be <br />responsible for the costs of construction of all infrastructure internal to the site. <br />The Developer has requested that a cost share agreement be approved for the final segment of Puma Street. The <br />Developer proposes to share the cost between itself, the City, and Capstone Homes (Owner/Developer of parcel to <br />the west). This will be discussed in detail with the Preliminary Plat. Action at this stage does not obligate or commit <br />the City to any investment in the project. <br />Recommendation: <br />When considering a Staff Recommendation, Staff is reviewing the revised concept against the following talking <br />points raised during the first stages of review. <br />1. Consistency of the Comprehensive Plan <br />2. Needing a more compelling reason to amend the Comprehensive Plan, or leave as Low Density Residential <br />3. Creating a more meaningful Density Transitioning Plan (wider lots AND deeper lots) <br />The Developer has chosen to revise the concept to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The Developer is <br />requesting a deviation to lot width and lot depth, necessitating a Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development. <br />The Developer appears to have attempted to address the desire for wider and deeper lots adjacent to the existing <br />residential neighborhood. The Property Owner has agreed in concept to conveying the area needed for the Lake <br />Itasca Greenway. <br />With these factors considered, Staff feels that this is a reasonable compromise and would support the Planning <br />Commission and City Council in approving this project. That being said, a reminder that the City is not obligated to <br />approve this project. This is a policy -level decision that requires direction from the City Council. <br />Action: <br />Motion to introduce Ordinance # 17-16 approving a Conditional Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development, <br />conditioned upon substantial compliance with the Sketch Plan dated September 18, 2017. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Revised Sketch Plan <br />Planned Unit Development Requirements <br />Conditional Zoning Amendment Requirements <br />Staff Review Letter <br />Lake Itasca Greenway Concept <br />Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated June 12, 2017 <br />DRAFT City Council Meeting Minutes dated June 27, 2017 <br />DRAFT City Council Meeting Minutes dated August 22, 2017 <br />DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes dated September 7, 2017 <br />Planning Commission Presentation dated October 12, 2017 <br />DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes dated October 12, 2017 <br />Ordinance #17-16 <br />Resolution #17-10-276 <br />DRAFT Conditional Rezoning Agreement <br />Inbox <br />Tim Gladhill (Originator) <br />Form Review <br />Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill 10/19/2017 08:19 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.